On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 09:03:14AM -0400, Jerome Glisse wrote:
> Date: Tue, 18 Sep 2018 09:03:14 -0400
> From: Jerome Glisse
> To: Kenneth Lee
> CC: Kenneth Lee , Alex Williamson
> , Herbert Xu ,
> k...@vger.kernel.org, Jonathan Corbet , Greg Kroah-Hartman
> , Joerg Roedel ,
>
Hi Robin,
Could you help take a look at this patch since I changed the v7s
here?
Thanks.
On Mon, 2018-09-03 at 14:01 +0800, Yong Wu wrote:
> MediaTek extend the arm v7s descriptor to support the dram over 4GB.
>
> In the mt2712 and mt8173, it's called "4GB mode", the physical address
> is
On Wed, 19 Sep 2018 22:25:03 +
"Eads, Gage" wrote:
> > This looks good and also addresses Alan's concern that don't
> > silently hide under the rug for all devices. We'll also queue it
> > for testing just to confirm and keep you posted.
> >
> > Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj
> >
>
> Hi Alex,
> This looks good and also addresses Alan's concern that don't silently hide
> under
> the rug for all devices. We'll also queue it for testing just to confirm and
> keep
> you posted.
>
> Reviewed-by: Ashok Raj
>
Hi Alex,
I've confirmed that the patch works as intended for the 8086:270c
Hi Alex
On Tue, Sep 18, 2018 at 09:59:57PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Sep 2018 10:46:19 -0700
> "Raj, Ashok" wrote:
>
> > On Thu, Aug 09, 2018 at 01:44:17PM -0600, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > > On Thu, 9 Aug 2018 12:37:06 -0700
> > > Ashok Raj wrote:
> > >
> > > >
On Tue, Jul 24, 2018 at 03:13:37PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> Hi Will,
>
>
> On Wed, Jun 27, 2018 at 10:07 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi Vivek,
> >
> > On Tue, Jun 19, 2018 at 02:04:44PM +0530, Vivek Gautam wrote:
> >> On Fri, Jun 15, 2018 at 10:22 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> >> > On Fri, Jun
Any comments? I have a a few things piled up that base on this, so
some forward progress would be great.
On Mon, Sep 10, 2018 at 08:13:29AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> the dma_get_required_mask dma API implementation has always been a little
> odd, in that we by default don't
Since these are trivially handled by the .domain_{get,set}_attr
callbacks when relevant, we can streamline struct iommu_ops for
everyone.
Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy
---
drivers/iommu/fsl_pamu_domain.c | 125 +---
include/linux/iommu.h | 6 --
2 files
The external interface to get/set window attributes is already
abstracted behind iommu_domain_{get,set}_attr(), so there's no real
reason for the internal interface to be different. Since we only have
one window-based driver anyway, clean up the core code by just moving
the DOMAIN_ATTR_WINDOWS