On Sun, 1 Mar 2020, David Rientjes wrote:
> When an atomic pool becomes fully depleted because it is now relied upon
> for all non-blocking allocations through the DMA API, allow background
> expansion of each pool by a kworker.
>
> When an atomic pool has less than the default size of memory
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 05:55:05PM +0200, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
> From c98dc05cdd45ae923654f2427985bd28bcde4bb2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Laurentiu Tudor
> Date: Thu, 13 Feb 2020 11:59:12 +0200
> Subject: [PATCH 1/4] bus: fsl-mc: add custom .dma_configure implementation
> Content-Type:
Print size_t as %zu or %zx to fix -Wformat warnings when compiling on
64-bit platform (e.g. with COMPILE_TEST):
drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c: In function ‘flush_iotlb_page’:
drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c:437:47: warning:
format ‘%x’ expects argument of type ‘unsigned int’,
but
pointers should be casted to unsigned long to avoid
-Wpointer-to-int-cast warnings when compiling on 64-bit platform (e.g.
with COMPILE_TEST):
drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c: In function ‘omap2_iommu_enable’:
drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c:170:25: warning:
cast from pointer to integer of
Some of the IOMMU drivers can be compile tested to increase build
coverage. The OMAP, Rockchip and Exynos drivers use
device.dev_archdata.iommu field which does not exist on all platforms.
The sPAPR TCE and ARM SMMU have also restrictions where they can be
built.
Signed-off-by: Krzysztof
Although the OMAP IOMMU driver supports only ARMv7 (32-bit) platforms,
it can be compile tested for other architectures, including 64-bit ones.
In such case the warning appears:
In file included from drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c:33:0:
drivers/iommu/omap-iommu.c: In function
Hi Joerg,
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 04:08:06PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> here is a patch-set to rename iommu_param to dev_iommu and
> establish it as a struct for generic per-device iommu-data.
> Also move the iommu_fwspec pointer from struct device into
> dev_iommu to have less iommu-related
Hi Russell,
On 03.03.2020 17:49, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 04:18:57PM +0200, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
On 28.02.2020 20:32, Robin Murphy wrote:
[ +Laurentiu ]
Hi Russell,
Thanks for sharing a log, now I properly understand what's up... further
comments at
On Tue, Feb 04, 2020 at 07:35:00PM +, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> Hello Konrad,
>
> Looking fwd. to your feedback regarding support of other memory
> encryption architectures such as Power, S390, etc.
>
> Thanks,
> Ashish
>
> On Fri, Jan 24, 2020 at 11:00:08PM +, Ashish Kalra wrote:
> > On
Hi Michael, Joerg,
On 3/3/20 5:09 PM, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 04:53:19PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
>> On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 09:00:05AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
>>> Not necessarily. E.g. some power systems have neither.
>>> There are also systems looking to
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 04:53:19PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 09:00:05AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> > Not necessarily. E.g. some power systems have neither.
> > There are also systems looking to bypass ACPI e.g. for boot speed.
>
> If there is no firmware layer
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 09:00:05AM -0500, Michael S. Tsirkin wrote:
> Not necessarily. E.g. some power systems have neither.
> There are also systems looking to bypass ACPI e.g. for boot speed.
If there is no firmware layer between the hardware and the OS the
necessary information the OS needs to
On 28.02.2020 20:32, Robin Murphy wrote:
[ +Laurentiu ]
Hi Russell,
Thanks for sharing a log, now I properly understand what's up... further
comments at the end (for context).
On 28/02/2020 10:06 am, Russell King - ARM Linux admin wrote:
On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 09:33:40AM +, John
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 04:18:57PM +0200, Laurentiu Tudor wrote:
>
>
> On 28.02.2020 20:32, Robin Murphy wrote:
> > [ +Laurentiu ]
> >
> > Hi Russell,
> >
> > Thanks for sharing a log, now I properly understand what's up... further
> > comments at the end (for context).
> >
> > On 28/02/2020
On Mon, Mar 02, 2020 at 05:16:12PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 06:25:36PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> > This solution isn't elegant nor foolproof, but is the best we can do at
> > the moment and works with existing virtio-iommu implementations. It also
> >
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 02:01:56PM +0100, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> Hi Eric,
>
> On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 11:19:20AM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
> > Michael has pushed this solution (putting the "configuration in the PCI
> > config space"), I think for those main reasons:
> > - ACPI may not be supported
Hi Zhangfei,
On 3/3/20 1:57 PM, zhangfei wrote:
> Hi, Eric
>
> On 2019/11/20 下午6:18, Auger Eric wrote:
>>
This series brings the VFIO part of HW nested paging support
in the SMMUv3.
The series depends on:
[PATCH v9 00/14] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part)
Hi Baolu,
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 02:47:02PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> Theoretically speaking, per-device default domain is impractical. PCI
> aliased devices (PCI bridge and all devices beneath it, VMD devices and
> various devices quirked with pci_add_dma_alias()) must use the same
> domain.
Hi Eric,
On Tue, Mar 03, 2020 at 11:19:20AM +0100, Auger Eric wrote:
> Michael has pushed this solution (putting the "configuration in the PCI
> config space"), I think for those main reasons:
> - ACPI may not be supported on some archs/hyps
But on those there is device-tree, right?
> - the
Hi, Eric
On 2019/11/20 下午6:18, Auger Eric wrote:
This series brings the VFIO part of HW nested paging support
in the SMMUv3.
The series depends on:
[PATCH v9 00/14] SMMUv3 Nested Stage Setup (IOMMU part)
(https://www.spinics.net/lists/kernel/msg3187714.html)
3 new IOCTLs are introduced that
On Mon, Feb 24, 2020 at 10:22:02AM -0800, Raj, Ashok wrote:
> Hi Kenneth,
>
> sorry for waking up late on this patchset.
>
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 10:12:46PM +0800, Zhangfei Gao wrote:
> [... trimmed]
>
> > +
> > +static int uacce_fops_open(struct inode *inode, struct file *filep)
> > +{
>
On 21/01/2020 09:56, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 18/12/2019 4:39 am, Cong Wang wrote:
Both find_iova() and __free_iova() take iova_rbtree_lock,
there is no reason to take and release it twice inside
free_iova().
Fold them into one critical section by calling the unlock
versions instead.
Makes
Hi Joerg,
On 3/2/20 5:16 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> On Fri, Feb 28, 2020 at 06:25:36PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>> This solution isn't elegant nor foolproof, but is the best we can do at
>> the moment and works with existing virtio-iommu implementations. It also
>> enables an IOMMU for
23 matches
Mail list logo
