RE: (proposal) RE: [PATCH v7 00/16] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs

2020-10-13 Thread Tian, Kevin
Hi, Alex and Jason (G), How about your opinion for this new proposal? For now looks both Jason (W) and Jean are OK with this direction and more discussions are possibly required for the new /dev/ioasid interface. Internally we're doing a quick prototype to see any unforeseen issue with this

RE: (proposal) RE: [PATCH v7 00/16] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs

2020-10-13 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Jason Wang > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 2:22 PM > > > On 2020/10/12 下午4:38, Tian, Kevin wrote: > >> From: Jason Wang > >> Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 12:20 PM > >> > > [...] > > > If it's possible, I would suggest a generic uAPI instead of a VFIO > >> specific one. > >> >

RE: (proposal) RE: [PATCH v7 00/16] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs

2020-10-13 Thread Tian, Kevin
> From: Jean-Philippe Brucker > Sent: Tuesday, October 13, 2020 6:28 PM > > On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 08:38:54AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > > From: Jason Wang > > > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 12:20 PM > > > > > [...] > > > If it's possible, I would suggest a generic uAPI instead of a

Re: [PATCH next] iommu: intel: don't dereference iommu_device if IOMMU_API is not built

2020-10-13 Thread Lu Baolu
On 10/13/20 3:30 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: From: Bartosz Golaszewski Since commit c40c1018 ("iommu/vt-d: Gracefully handle DMAR units with no supported address widths") dmar.c needs struct iommu_device to be selected. We can drop this dependency by not dereferencing struct

Re: [PATCH v3 6/8] iommu/arm-smmu: Add impl hook for inherit boot mappings

2020-10-13 Thread Robin Murphy
On 2020-10-12 08:31, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Mon 21 Sep 23:08 CEST 2020, Will Deacon wrote: On Sat, Sep 12, 2020 at 10:25:59PM -0500, Bjorn Andersson wrote: On Fri 11 Sep 12:13 CDT 2020, Robin Murphy wrote: On 2020-09-04 16:55, Bjorn Andersson wrote: Add a new operation to allow platform

Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/msm: add DRM_MSM_GEM_SYNC_CACHE for non-coherent cache maintenance

2020-10-13 Thread Rob Clark
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 6:42 AM Robin Murphy wrote: > > On 2020-10-07 07:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > > On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 09:19:32AM -0400, Jonathan Marek wrote: > >> One example why drm/msm can't use DMA API is multiple page table support > >> (that is landing in 5.10), which is

[git pull] IOMMU Updates for Linux v5.10

2020-10-13 Thread Joerg Roedel
Hi Linus, there is a minor conflict this time in include/linux/iommu.h which should be easy to resolve. I would attach my resolution, but somehow git [show|log] didn't show it to me. The conflict is in a function signature, specifically the type of the pasid parameter. My resolution used

Re: [PATCH 2/3] drm/msm: add DRM_MSM_GEM_SYNC_CACHE for non-coherent cache maintenance

2020-10-13 Thread Robin Murphy
On 2020-10-07 07:25, Christoph Hellwig wrote: On Tue, Oct 06, 2020 at 09:19:32AM -0400, Jonathan Marek wrote: One example why drm/msm can't use DMA API is multiple page table support (that is landing in 5.10), which is something that definitely couldn't work with DMA API. Another one is being

Re: [PATCH v4 0/4] Add system mmu support for Armada-806

2020-10-13 Thread Robin Murphy
On 2020-10-06 16:16, Denis Odintsov wrote: Hi, Am 15.07.2020 um 09:06 schrieb Tomasz Nowicki : The series is meant to support SMMU for AP806 and a workaround for accessing ARM SMMU 64bit registers is the gist of it. For the record, AP-806 can't access SMMU registers with 64bit width. This

Re: [PATCH 1/9] dma-mapping: split

2020-10-13 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Thanks for the report, I've commited the obvious fix. ___ iommu mailing list iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu

Re: (proposal) RE: [PATCH v7 00/16] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs

2020-10-13 Thread Jean-Philippe Brucker
On Mon, Oct 12, 2020 at 08:38:54AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote: > > From: Jason Wang > > Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 12:20 PM > > > [...] > > If it's possible, I would suggest a generic uAPI instead of a VFIO > > specific one. > > > > Jason suggest something like /dev/sva. There will be a lot

答复: [PATCH v3 0/2] Add support for ACPI device in RMRR

2020-10-13 Thread FelixCui-oc
hi baolu, >By the way, I guess the problem you are facing can still be handled well >under current RMRR mechanism by simple putting the device in the >ACPI/ANDD table. It's worth trying. I understand what you mean is that just put the device in the ANDD table and don't use RMRR, right? But

Re: [PATCH next] iommu: intel: don't dereference iommu_device if IOMMU_API is not built

2020-10-13 Thread David Woodhouse
On Tue, 2020-10-13 at 09:30 +0200, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > Since commit c40c1018 ("iommu/vt-d: Gracefully handle DMAR units > with no supported address widths") dmar.c needs struct iommu_device to > be selected. We can drop this dependency by not

[PATCH 6/9] x86/hpet: Use irq_find_matching_fwspec() to find remapping irqdomain

2020-10-13 Thread David Woodhouse
From: David Woodhouse Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse --- arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c | 23 +-- 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c b/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c index 3b8b12769f3b..fb7736ca7b5b 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/hpet.c +++

[PATCH 4/9] iommu/vt-d: Implement select() method on remapping irqdomain

2020-10-13 Thread David Woodhouse
From: David Woodhouse Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse --- drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c | 13 + 1 file changed, 13 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c b/drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c index 511dfb4884bc..40c2fec122b8 100644 ---

[PATCH 0/9] Remove irq_remapping_get_irq_domain()

2020-10-13 Thread David Woodhouse
I didn't much like the I/OAPIC and HPET drivers having magical knowledge that they had to substitute x86_vector_domain if their call to irq_remapping_get_irq_domain() returned NULL. When Thomas tried to make it handle error returns from …get_irq_domain() distinctly from the NULL case too, it

[PATCH 7/9] x86/ioapic: Use irq_find_matching_fwspec() to find remapping irqdomain

2020-10-13 Thread David Woodhouse
From: David Woodhouse Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse --- arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c | 24 1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c b/arch/x86/kernel/apic/io_apic.c index ca2da19d5c55..73cacc92c3bb 100644 ---

[PATCH 1/9] genirq/irqdomain: Implement get_name() method on irqchip fwnodes

2020-10-13 Thread David Woodhouse
From: David Woodhouse Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse --- kernel/irq/irqdomain.c | 11 ++- 1 file changed, 10 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c b/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c index 76cd7ebd1178..6440f97c412e 100644 --- a/kernel/irq/irqdomain.c +++

[PATCH 5/9] iommu/hyper-v: Implement select() method on remapping irqdomain

2020-10-13 Thread David Woodhouse
From: David Woodhouse Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse --- drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c | 9 + 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c index 37dd485a5640..6a8966fbc3bd 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c +++

[PATCH 9/9] iommu/vt-d: Simplify intel_irq_remapping_select()

2020-10-13 Thread David Woodhouse
From: David Woodhouse Now that the old get_irq_domain() method has gone, we can consolidate on just the map_XXX_to_iommu() functions. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse --- drivers/iommu/intel/irq_remapping.c | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-) diff --git

[PATCH 3/9] iommu/amd: Implement select() method on remapping irqdomain

2020-10-13 Thread David Woodhouse
From: David Woodhouse Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse --- drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c | 19 +++ 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+) diff --git a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c b/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c index 13d0a8f42d56..7ecebc5d255f 100644 --- a/drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c +++

[PATCH 8/9] x86: Kill all traces of irq_remapping_get_irq_domain()

2020-10-13 Thread David Woodhouse
From: David Woodhouse Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse --- arch/x86/include/asm/hw_irq.h| 2 -- arch/x86/include/asm/irq_remapping.h | 9 drivers/iommu/amd/iommu.c| 34 drivers/iommu/hyperv-iommu.c | 9

[PATCH 2/9] x86/apic: Add select() method on vector irqdomain

2020-10-13 Thread David Woodhouse
From: David Woodhouse This will be used to select the irqdomain for I/OAPIC and HPET. Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse --- arch/x86/include/asm/irqdomain.h | 3 +++ arch/x86/kernel/apic/vector.c| 43 2 files changed, 46 insertions(+) diff --git

Re: [PATCH v3 02/24] dt-bindings: memory: mediatek: Convert SMI to DT schema

2020-10-13 Thread Yong Wu
On Mon, 2020-10-12 at 15:26 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Mon, 12 Oct 2020 at 14:02, Yong Wu wrote: > > > > On Mon, 2020-10-12 at 09:18 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On Sat, Oct 10, 2020 at 02:18:11PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2020-10-06 at 09:15 +0200, Krzysztof

Re: [PATCH v3 01/24] dt-bindings: iommu: mediatek: Convert IOMMU to DT schema

2020-10-13 Thread Yong Wu
On Mon, 2020-10-12 at 19:08 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > On Tue, 6 Oct 2020 at 06:27, Yong Wu wrote: > > > > On Fri, 2020-10-02 at 13:07 +0200, Krzysztof Kozlowski wrote: > > > On Wed, Sep 30, 2020 at 03:06:24PM +0800, Yong Wu wrote: > > > > Convert MediaTek IOMMU to DT schema. > > > > > >

Re: [PATCH next] iommu: intel: make DMAR_TABLE select IOMMU_API

2020-10-13 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
On Tue, Oct 13, 2020 at 3:33 AM Lu Baolu wrote: > > Hi, > > On 10/12/20 8:31 PM, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > > From: Bartosz Golaszewski > > > > Since commit c40c1018 ("iommu/vt-d: Gracefully handle DMAR units > > with no supported address widths") dmar.c needs struct iommu_device to > > be

[PATCH next] iommu: intel: don't dereference iommu_device if IOMMU_API is not built

2020-10-13 Thread Bartosz Golaszewski
From: Bartosz Golaszewski Since commit c40c1018 ("iommu/vt-d: Gracefully handle DMAR units with no supported address widths") dmar.c needs struct iommu_device to be selected. We can drop this dependency by not dereferencing struct iommu_device if IOMMU_API is not selected and by reusing the

Re: (proposal) RE: [PATCH v7 00/16] vfio: expose virtual Shared Virtual Addressing to VMs

2020-10-13 Thread Jason Wang
On 2020/10/12 下午4:38, Tian, Kevin wrote: From: Jason Wang Sent: Monday, September 14, 2020 12:20 PM [...] > If it's possible, I would suggest a generic uAPI instead of a VFIO specific one. Jason suggest something like /dev/sva. There will be a lot of other subsystems that could benefit