On Feb 25, 2014 8:28 PM, "Varun Sethi" wrote:
>
>
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: iommu-boun...@lists.linux-foundation.org [mailto:iommu-
> > boun...@lists.linux-foundation.org] On Behalf Of Will Deacon
> > Sent: Monday, February 24, 2014
On Feb 25, 2014 2:28 AM, "Will Deacon" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:12:21PM +0000, srikanth TS wrote:
> > Hi Will Deacon,
>
> Hello,
>
> > Currently SMMU driver expecting all stream ID used by respective master
> > should be defined in the DT.
&
On Feb 25, 2014 2:28 AM, "Will Deacon" wrote:
>
> On Mon, Feb 24, 2014 at 03:12:21PM +0000, srikanth TS wrote:
> > Hi Will Deacon,
>
> Hello,
>
> > Currently SMMU driver expecting all stream ID used by respective master
> > should be defined in the DT.
&
Hi Will Deacon,
Currently SMMU driver expecting all stream ID used by respective master
should be defined in the DT.
We want to know how to handle in the case of virtual functions dynamically
created and destroyed.
Is PCI driver responsible for creating stream ID respective BDand
requesting SM
