Hi Arnd,
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 16:56:53 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 15:53:25 Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 17.12.2014, 15:27 +0100 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 01:24:42 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
If we forbid the IOMMU driver from
On Thursday 18 December 2014 22:36:14 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
(currently only on ARM64, not ARM32, until someone adds support). I can see
your point regarding machines that have a mandatory IOMMU with no fallback
when there is no driver, but we can support them by making the iommu driver
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 01:24:42 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
If we forbid the IOMMU driver from being compiled as a module can't we just
rely on deferred probing ? The bus master driver will just be reprobed after
the IOMMU gets probed, like for other devices.
This could fail in case
Hi Arnd,
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 15:27:36 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 01:24:42 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
If we forbid the IOMMU driver from being compiled as a module can't we
just rely on deferred probing ? The bus master driver will just be
reprobed after the
Am Mittwoch, den 17.12.2014, 15:27 +0100 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 01:24:42 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
If we forbid the IOMMU driver from being compiled as a module can't we just
rely on deferred probing ? The bus master driver will just be reprobed
after
the
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 16:39:02 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 15:27:36 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 01:24:42 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
If we forbid the IOMMU driver from being compiled as a module can't we
just rely on deferred probing
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 15:53:25 Lucas Stach wrote:
Am Mittwoch, den 17.12.2014, 15:27 +0100 schrieb Arnd Bergmann:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 01:24:42 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
If we forbid the IOMMU driver from being compiled as a module can't we
just
rely on deferred
Hi Arnd,
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 16:41:33 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 16:39:02 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 15:27:36 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 01:24:42 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
If we forbid the IOMMU driver
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 18:02:51 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 16:41:33 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 16:39:02 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 15:27:36 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 01:24:42
Hi Arnd,
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 22:58:47 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 18:02:51 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 16:41:33 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014 16:39:02 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Wednesday 17 December 2014
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 14:07:11 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
Hi Arnd,
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 12:40:28 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 15 December 2014 18:13:23 Will Deacon wrote:
IOMMUs are not as low-level as system interrupt controllers or
system clocks. I'm beginning to agree
Hi Arnd,
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 13:10:59 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 14:07:11 Laurent Pinchart wrote:
On Tuesday 16 December 2014 12:40:28 Arnd Bergmann wrote:
On Monday 15 December 2014 18:13:23 Will Deacon wrote:
IOMMUs are not as low-level as system
12 matches
Mail list logo