On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:16:13PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> The generic IOMMU binding says that the meaning of an 'IOMMU specifier'
> is defined by the binding of a specific SMMU. The ARM SMMU binding
> never explicitly uses the term 'specifier' at all. Update implicit
> references to use the
On Fri, Dec 16, 2016 at 02:08:09PM +, Stuart Yoder wrote:
>
> > -Original Message-
> > From: Mark Rutland [mailto:mark.rutl...@arm.com]
> >
> > On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:16:13PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> > > In the iommu-map binding change references to iommu-specifier to
> > > "
ndation.org; will.dea...@arm.com
> Subject: Re: [PATCH] Docs: dt: Be explicit and consistent in reference to
> IOMMU specifiers
>
> Hi Stuart,
>
> On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:16:13PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> > The generic IOMMU binding says that the meaning of an 'I
Hi Stuart,
On Thu, Dec 15, 2016 at 06:16:13PM -0600, Stuart Yoder wrote:
> The generic IOMMU binding says that the meaning of an 'IOMMU specifier'
> is defined by the binding of a specific SMMU. The ARM SMMU binding
> never explicitly uses the term 'specifier' at all. Update implicit
> reference
The generic IOMMU binding says that the meaning of an 'IOMMU specifier'
is defined by the binding of a specific SMMU. The ARM SMMU binding
never explicitly uses the term 'specifier' at all. Update implicit
references to use the explicit term.
In the iommu-map binding change references to iommu-s
