Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: use the iommu list for the dma-mapping subsystem

2017-09-01 Thread Joerg Roedel
On Fri, Sep 01, 2017 at 10:48:50AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 01/09/17 08:56, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > > Hi Christoph, > > > > On 2017-09-01 09:50, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > >> Any comments? I'd like to add this to the 4.14 pull request. > >> > >> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 11:27:34AM +0200,

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: use the iommu list for the dma-mapping subsystem

2017-09-01 Thread Robin Murphy
On 01/09/17 08:56, Marek Szyprowski wrote: > Hi Christoph, > > On 2017-09-01 09:50, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >> Any comments? I'd like to add this to the 4.14 pull request. >> >> On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 11:27:34AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: >>> Maintaining a subsystem with linux-kernel as

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: use the iommu list for the dma-mapping subsystem

2017-09-01 Thread Marek Szyprowski
Hi Christoph, On 2017-09-01 09:50, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Any comments? I'd like to add this to the 4.14 pull request. On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 11:27:34AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: Maintaining a subsystem with linux-kernel as the main list is painful as it has way to much traffic. On

Re: [PATCH] MAINTAINERS: use the iommu list for the dma-mapping subsystem

2017-09-01 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Any comments? I'd like to add this to the 4.14 pull request. On Sat, Aug 26, 2017 at 11:27:34AM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote: > Maintaining a subsystem with linux-kernel as the main list is painful > as it has way to much traffic. On the other hand the dma-mapping > subsystem is small enough

[PATCH] MAINTAINERS: use the iommu list for the dma-mapping subsystem

2017-08-26 Thread Christoph Hellwig
Maintaining a subsystem with linux-kernel as the main list is painful as it has way to much traffic. On the other hand the dma-mapping subsystem is small enough that a list on its own would be silly. So use the list for the closes subsystem instead instead. Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig