Thanks,
applied to the dma-mapping for-next branch.
___
iommu mailing list
iommu@lists.linux-foundation.org
https://lists.linuxfoundation.org/mailman/listinfo/iommu
On 6/10/19 10:26 PM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Looks good to me. When did this start to show up? Do we need
> to push it to Linus this cycle and cc stable?
You need a really contrived memory map layout to reach that situation,
so I don't think it warrants a stable backport.
For ARM64, this see
Looks good to me. When did this start to show up? Do we need
to push it to Linus this cycle and cc stable?
With architectures allowing the kernel to be placed almost arbitrarily
in memory (e.g.: ARM64), it is possible to have the kernel resides at
physical addresses above 4GB, resulting in neither the default CMA area,
nor the atomic pool from successfully allocating. This does not prevent
specific peri
