> On 3 May 2017, at 11:32, Robin Murphy wrote:
>
>> On 28/04/17 14:22, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 28 April 2017 at 14:17, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 02:14:49PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 28 April 2017 at 14:11, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Ard,
>
> [+
On 28/04/17 14:22, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 28 April 2017 at 14:17, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 02:14:49PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>>> On 28 April 2017 at 14:11, Will Deacon wrote:
Hi Ard,
[+ devicetree@]
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 01:43:15PM +0100,
On 28 April 2017 at 14:17, Will Deacon wrote:
> On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 02:14:49PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> On 28 April 2017 at 14:11, Will Deacon wrote:
>> > Hi Ard,
>> >
>> > [+ devicetree@]
>> >
>> > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 01:43:15PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> >> DT nodes may have
On Fri, Apr 28, 2017 at 02:14:49PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> On 28 April 2017 at 14:11, Will Deacon wrote:
> > Hi Ard,
> >
> > [+ devicetree@]
> >
> > On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 01:43:15PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> >> DT nodes may have a status property, and if they do, such nodes should
>
On 28 April 2017 at 14:11, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Ard,
>
> [+ devicetree@]
>
> On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 01:43:15PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
>> DT nodes may have a status property, and if they do, such nodes should
>> only be considered present if the status property is set to 'okay'.
>>
>> Cur
Hi Ard,
[+ devicetree@]
On Fri, Apr 14, 2017 at 01:43:15PM +0100, Ard Biesheuvel wrote:
> DT nodes may have a status property, and if they do, such nodes should
> only be considered present if the status property is set to 'okay'.
>
> Currently, we call the init function of IOMMUs described by t
DT nodes may have a status property, and if they do, such nodes should
only be considered present if the status property is set to 'okay'.
Currently, we call the init function of IOMMUs described by the device
tree without taking this into account, which may result in the output
below on systems w
