Hi Robin,
On Fri, Sep 04, 2020 at 10:58:14AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2020-09-04 10:37, Joerg Roedel wrote:
> > Adding Robin.
>
> Did you miss that I've reviewed this already? :)
>
> https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/3afcc7b2-0bfb-b79c-513f-1beb66c5f...@arm.com/
Hmm, that mail wasn't i
Hi Joerg,
On 2020-09-04 10:37, Joerg Roedel wrote:
Adding Robin.
Did you miss that I've reviewed this already? :)
https://lore.kernel.org/linux-iommu/3afcc7b2-0bfb-b79c-513f-1beb66c5f...@arm.com/
Robin.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 04:43:54PM +0800, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
From: Yuqi Jin
The pe
Adding Robin.
On Thu, Aug 27, 2020 at 04:43:54PM +0800, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
> From: Yuqi Jin
>
> The performance of the atomic_xchg is better than atomic_cmpxchg because
> no comparison is required. While the value of @fq_timer_on can only be 0
> or 1. Let's use atomic_xchg instead of atomic_cm
On 2020-08-27 09:43, Shaokun Zhang wrote:
From: Yuqi Jin
The performance of the atomic_xchg is better than atomic_cmpxchg because
no comparison is required. While the value of @fq_timer_on can only be 0
or 1. Let's use atomic_xchg instead of atomic_cmpxchg here because we
only need to check tha
From: Yuqi Jin
The performance of the atomic_xchg is better than atomic_cmpxchg because
no comparison is required. While the value of @fq_timer_on can only be 0
or 1. Let's use atomic_xchg instead of atomic_cmpxchg here because we
only need to check that the value changes from 0 to 1 or from 1 to
