> From: Steve Wahl
> Sent: Wednesday, May 11, 2022 3:07 AM
>
> On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:16:26AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > From: Steve Wahl
> > > Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 11:26 PM
> > >
> > > On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 08:12:11AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > > From: David Woodhouse
>
On Tue, May 10, 2022 at 01:16:26AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Steve Wahl
> > Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 11:26 PM
> >
> > On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 08:12:11AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > From: David Woodhouse
> > > > Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 3:17 PM
> > > >
> > > > On Fri,
> From: Steve Wahl
> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 11:26 PM
>
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 08:12:11AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > From: David Woodhouse
> > > Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 3:17 PM
> > >
> > > On Fri, 2022-05-06 at 06:49 +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > > From: Baolu Lu
> > > > >
> >
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 08:12:11AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: David Woodhouse
> > Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 3:17 PM
> >
> > On Fri, 2022-05-06 at 06:49 +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > > From: Baolu Lu
> > > >
> > > > > --- a/include/linux/dmar.h
> > > > > +++ b/include/linux/dmar.h
> >
> From: David Woodhouse
> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 3:17 PM
>
> On Fri, 2022-05-06 at 06:49 +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > > From: Baolu Lu
> > >
> > > > --- a/include/linux/dmar.h
> > > > +++ b/include/linux/dmar.h
> > > > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> > > > struct acpi_dmar_header;
> > > >
> > > >
> From: Rodel, Jorg
> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 3:11 PM
>
> On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 06:49:43AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > another nit: dmar is intel specific thus CONFIG_X86 is always true.
>
> There are Itanium systems which have DMAR units. Is that no longer
> supported?
>
Sorry I just
On Fri, 2022-05-06 at 06:49 +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> > From: Baolu Lu
> >
> > > --- a/include/linux/dmar.h
> > > +++ b/include/linux/dmar.h
> > > @@ -19,7 +19,7 @@
> > > struct acpi_dmar_header;
> > >
> > > #ifdef CONFIG_X86
> > > -# define DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTEDMAX_IO_APICS
> > > +#
On Fri, May 06, 2022 at 06:49:43AM +, Tian, Kevin wrote:
> another nit: dmar is intel specific thus CONFIG_X86 is always true.
There are Itanium systems which have DMAR units. Is that no longer
supported?
Regards,
--
Jörg Rödel
jroe...@suse.de
SUSE Software Solutions Germany GmbH
> From: Baolu Lu
> Sent: Friday, May 6, 2022 1:57 PM
>
> On 2022/5/6 03:46, Steve Wahl wrote:
> > Increase DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED to support 64 sockets with 10 DMAR
> units
> > each, for a total of 640.
> >
> > If the available hardware exceeds DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED (previously
> set
> > to
On 2022/5/6 03:46, Steve Wahl wrote:
Increase DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED to support 64 sockets with 10 DMAR units
each, for a total of 640.
If the available hardware exceeds DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED (previously set
to MAX_IO_APICS, or 128), it causes these messages: "DMAR: Failed to
allocate seq_id",
Increase DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED to support 64 sockets with 10 DMAR units
each, for a total of 640.
If the available hardware exceeds DMAR_UNITS_SUPPORTED (previously set
to MAX_IO_APICS, or 128), it causes these messages: "DMAR: Failed to
allocate seq_id", "DMAR: Parse DMAR table failure.", and
11 matches
Mail list logo
