Re: [PATCH 0/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Add an optional "input-address-size" property

2019-10-11 Thread Nicolin Chen
On Fri, Oct 11, 2019 at 10:16:28AM +0100, Robin Murphy wrote: > On 2019-10-11 4:46 am, Nicolin Chen wrote: > > This series of patches add an optional DT property to allow an SoC to > > specify how many bits being physically connected to its SMMU instance, > > depending on the SoC design. > > This

Re: [PATCH 0/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Add an optional "input-address-size" property

2019-10-11 Thread Robin Murphy
On 2019-10-11 4:46 am, Nicolin Chen wrote: This series of patches add an optional DT property to allow an SoC to specify how many bits being physically connected to its SMMU instance, depending on the SoC design. This has come up before, and it doesn't work in general because a single SMMU

[PATCH 0/2] iommu/arm-smmu: Add an optional "input-address-size" property

2019-10-10 Thread Nicolin Chen
This series of patches add an optional DT property to allow an SoC to specify how many bits being physically connected to its SMMU instance, depending on the SoC design. Nicolin Chen (2): dt-bindings: arm-smmu: Add an optional "input-address-size" property iommu/arm-smmu: Read optional