Joerg,
Thank you for reviewing this patch.
ZhenHua
On 09/24/2013 07:05 PM, Joerg Roedel wrote:
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 04:38:29PM +0800, ZhenHua wrote:
Hi Guys,
Though DMAR_ICS_REG is not used yet, I think this patch is
necessary. So please take a look at it.
You are right, my Spec
On Tue, Sep 17, 2013 at 04:38:29PM +0800, ZhenHua wrote:
> Hi Guys,
> Though DMAR_ICS_REG is not used yet, I think this patch is
> necessary. So please take a look at it.
You are right, my Spec says the same. It doesn't matter much since the
register seems to be unused in the VT-d driver. I a
Hi Guys,
Though DMAR_ICS_REG is not used yet, I think this patch is
necessary. So please take a look at it.
Thanks
ZhenHua
On 09/13/2013 02:27 PM, Li, Zhen-Hua wrote:
According to Intel Vt-D specs, the offset of Invalidation complete
status register should be 0x9C, not 0x98.
See Intel's
According to Intel Vt-D specs, the offset of Invalidation complete
status register should be 0x9C, not 0x98.
See Intel's VT-d spec, Revision 1.3, Chapter 10.4, Page 98;
Signed-off-by: Li, Zhen-Hua
---
include/linux/intel-iommu.h | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git
