Re: [PATCH 11/12] platform-msi: Add platform check for subdevice irq domain

2021-02-08 Thread Leon Romanovsky
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 12:56:44PM -0800, Megha Dey wrote: > From: Lu Baolu > > The pci_subdevice_msi_create_irq_domain() should fail if the underlying > platform is not able to support IMS (Interrupt Message Storage). Otherwise, > the isolation of interrupt is not guaranteed. > > For x86, IMS is

Re: [PATCH 11/12] platform-msi: Add platform check for subdevice irq domain

2021-02-04 Thread Lu Baolu
Hi Jason, On 2021/2/4 20:14, Jason Gunthorpe wrote: On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 12:56:44PM -0800, Megha Dey wrote: +bool arch_support_pci_device_ims(struct pci_dev *pdev) +{ Consistent language please, we are not using IMS elsewhere, this feature is called device_msi in Linux. Thanks for

Re: [PATCH 11/12] platform-msi: Add platform check for subdevice irq domain

2021-02-04 Thread Jason Gunthorpe
On Wed, Feb 03, 2021 at 12:56:44PM -0800, Megha Dey wrote: > +bool arch_support_pci_device_ims(struct pci_dev *pdev) > +{ Consistent language please, we are not using IMS elsewhere, this feature is called device_msi in Linux. Jason ___ iommu mailing

[PATCH 11/12] platform-msi: Add platform check for subdevice irq domain

2021-02-03 Thread Megha Dey
From: Lu Baolu The pci_subdevice_msi_create_irq_domain() should fail if the underlying platform is not able to support IMS (Interrupt Message Storage). Otherwise, the isolation of interrupt is not guaranteed. For x86, IMS is only supported on bare metal for now. We could enable it in the