On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 11:53:34AM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> a) I think what was decided was introducing a device core "location"
> property that can be exposed to userspace to help it to decide whether
> or not to attach a driver to a device. Yes, that is still the plan.
Great, but this patch
Hello,
Thanks for taking a look.
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 7:18 AM Greg Kroah-Hartman
wrote:
>
> On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 05:27:10PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> > Introduce a PCI parameter that disables the automatic attachment of
> > untrusted devices to their drivers.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Rajat
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 05:27:10PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Introduce a PCI parameter that disables the automatic attachment of
> untrusted devices to their drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain
> ---
> Context:
>
> I set out to implement the approach outlined in
>
On Fri, Jun 26, 2020 at 10:27 AM Rajat Jain wrote:
>
> Introduce a PCI parameter that disables the automatic attachment of
> untrusted devices to their drivers.
>
> Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain
> ---
> Context:
>
> I set out to implement the approach outlined in
>
On Thu, Jun 25, 2020 at 05:27:10PM -0700, Rajat Jain wrote:
> Introduce a PCI parameter that disables the automatic attachment of
> untrusted devices to their drivers.
You didn't document this new api anywhere :(
___
iommu mailing list
Introduce a PCI parameter that disables the automatic attachment of
untrusted devices to their drivers.
Signed-off-by: Rajat Jain
---
Context:
I set out to implement the approach outlined in
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/9/1331
https://lkml.org/lkml/2020/6/15/1453
But to my
