On Thu, 30 Apr 2020 22:38:10 -0400 John Dorminy wrote:
> the change
> description refers to PROT_KERNEL, which is a symbol which does not
> appear to exist; perhaps PAGE_KERNEL was meant?
Yes, thanks, fixed.
___
iommu mailing list
>> On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:13:40PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>> > The pgprot argument to __vmalloc is always PROT_KERNEL now, so remove
>> > it.
Greetings;
I recently noticed this change via the linux-next tree.
It may not be possible to edit at this late date, but the change
Greetings;
I recently noticed this change via the linux-next tree.
It may not be possible to edit at this late date, but the change
description refers to PROT_KERNEL, which is a symbol which does not appear
to exist; perhaps PAGE_KERNEL was meant? The mismatch caused me and a
couple other folks
On Tue, Apr 14, 2020 at 03:13:40PM +0200, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> The pgprot argument to __vmalloc is always PROT_KERNEL now, so remove
> it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
> Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley [hyperv]
> Acked-by: Gao Xiang [erofs]
> Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
> ---
>
The pgprot argument to __vmalloc is always PROT_KERNEL now, so remove
it.
Signed-off-by: Christoph Hellwig
Reviewed-by: Michael Kelley [hyperv]
Acked-by: Gao Xiang [erofs]
Acked-by: Peter Zijlstra (Intel)
---
arch/x86/hyperv/hv_init.c | 3 +--
arch/x86/include/asm/kvm_host.h
