> On Jun 1, 2021, at 10:27 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>
> On 2021-06-01 17:39, Nadav Amit wrote:
>>> On Jun 1, 2021, at 8:59 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>>>
>>> On 2021-05-02 07:59, Nadav Amit wrote:
From: Nadav Amit
Some IOMMU architectures perform invalidations regardless of the page
>>
On 2021-06-01 17:39, Nadav Amit wrote:
On Jun 1, 2021, at 8:59 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2021-05-02 07:59, Nadav Amit wrote:
From: Nadav Amit
Some IOMMU architectures perform invalidations regardless of the page
size. In such architectures there is no need to sync when the page size
chang
> On Jun 1, 2021, at 8:59 AM, Robin Murphy wrote:
>
> On 2021-05-02 07:59, Nadav Amit wrote:
>> From: Nadav Amit
>> Some IOMMU architectures perform invalidations regardless of the page
>> size. In such architectures there is no need to sync when the page size
>> changes or to regard pgsize wh
On 2021-05-02 07:59, Nadav Amit wrote:
From: Nadav Amit
Some IOMMU architectures perform invalidations regardless of the page
size. In such architectures there is no need to sync when the page size
changes or to regard pgsize when making interim flush in
iommu_iotlb_gather_add_page().
Add a "i
From: Nadav Amit
Some IOMMU architectures perform invalidations regardless of the page
size. In such architectures there is no need to sync when the page size
changes or to regard pgsize when making interim flush in
iommu_iotlb_gather_add_page().
Add a "ignore_gather_pgsize" property for each IO