On 02/13/2014 11:04 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
It's harmless to enable CONFIG_ARM_AMBA, even if you don't have any AMBA
devices in your SoC,
Ah, ok. It's seems obvious now, but somehow that didn't click.
it just makes your binary a bit bigger because you're
compiling in code that you don't need
On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> index 0ae4dd39197f..6fe7922ecc1d 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> @@ -2004,8 +2004,10 @@ static int __init arm_smmu_init(void)
>
On Thu, Feb 13, 2014 at 04:55:25PM +, Timur Tabi wrote:
> On Thu, Feb 6, 2014 at 12:09 PM, Will Deacon wrote:
>
> > diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > index 0ae4dd39197f..6fe7922ecc1d 100644
> > --- a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
> > +++ b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.
If !CONFIG_ARM_AMBA, we shouldn't try to register ourselves with the
amba_bustype.
Signed-off-by: Will Deacon
---
drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c | 2 ++
1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c b/drivers/iommu/arm-smmu.c
index 0ae4dd39197f..6fe7922ecc1d 100644
--- a/drive
