On Thu, Nov 13 2014 at 01:48:26 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Ha, damn, then I don't have a user of the shiny new quirks field I added!
> I don't think I'll go as far as removing it altogether though...
I'm sure we'll be making liberal use of that field soon enough ;)
-Mitch
--
Qualcomm Innovatio
On Wed, Nov 12, 2014 at 06:58:17PM +, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
> On Wed, Nov 12 2014 at 10:26:43 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> > On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 01:51:38AM +0100, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
> >> Add a workaround for some buggy hardware that requires a TLB invalidate
> >> operation to occur at
On Wed, Nov 12 2014 at 10:26:43 AM, Will Deacon wrote:
> Hi Mitch,
>
> On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 01:51:38AM +0100, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
>> Add a workaround for some buggy hardware that requires a TLB invalidate
>> operation to occur at map time. Activate the feature with the
>> qcom,smmu-invalid
Hi Mitch,
On Wed, Aug 13, 2014 at 01:51:38AM +0100, Mitchel Humpherys wrote:
> Add a workaround for some buggy hardware that requires a TLB invalidate
> operation to occur at map time. Activate the feature with the
> qcom,smmu-invalidate-on-map boolean DT property.
I'm digging up an old thread he
Add a workaround for some buggy hardware that requires a TLB invalidate
operation to occur at map time. Activate the feature with the
qcom,smmu-invalidate-on-map boolean DT property.
Signed-off-by: Mitchel Humpherys
---
Documentation/devicetree/bindings/iommu/arm,smmu.txt | 4
drivers/iomm
