>>> Not necessarily. What I have in mind is something like this:
>>
>> This is a good idea, what I'm worried is this series is already large, so I
>> think we need to post
>> another series to do it.
>
> I wasn't asking to do it here, I was just offering a suggestion (and sharing
> some experien
On 2014/9/29 16:37, Lucas Stach wrote:
> Am Sonntag, den 28.09.2014, 14:11 +0800 schrieb Yijing Wang:
>> On 2014/9/28 10:32, Yijing Wang wrote:
>>> On 2014/9/26 17:05, Thierry Reding wrote:
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:54:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
[...]
> At least for Tegra it's
On Mon, Sep 29, 2014 at 09:44:17AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> On 2014/9/28 19:21, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:16:12AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> >> What I would like to see is a way of creating the pci_host_bridge
> >> structure outside
> >> the pci_create_root_
Am Sonntag, den 28.09.2014, 14:11 +0800 schrieb Yijing Wang:
> On 2014/9/28 10:32, Yijing Wang wrote:
> > On 2014/9/26 17:05, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:54:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> >> [...]
> >>> At least for Tegra it's trivial to just hook it up in
> >>> tegr
On 2014/9/28 19:21, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:16:12AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> What I would like to see is a way of creating the pci_host_bridge
>> structure outside
>> the pci_create_root_bus(). That would then allow us to pass this sort of
>> platform
>
On Sun, Sep 28, 2014 at 10:16:12AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> What I would like to see is a way of creating the pci_host_bridge
> structure outside
> the pci_create_root_bus(). That would then allow us to pass this sort of
> platform
> details like associated msi_chip in
On 2014/9/28 10:32, Yijing Wang wrote:
> On 2014/9/26 17:05, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:54:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
>> [...]
>>> At least for Tegra it's trivial to just hook it up in tegra_pcie_scan_bus()
>>> directly (patch attached).
>>
>> Really attached this ti
On 2014/9/26 17:05, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:54:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> [...]
>> At least for Tegra it's trivial to just hook it up in tegra_pcie_scan_bus()
>> directly (patch attached).
>
> Really attached this time.
>
> Thierry
>
It looks good to me, so I
What I would like to see is a way of creating the pci_host_bridge
structure outside
the pci_create_root_bus(). That would then allow us to pass this sort of
platform
details like associated msi_chip into the host bridge and the child busses
will
have an easy wa
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 10:54:32AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
[...]
> At least for Tegra it's trivial to just hook it up in tegra_pcie_scan_bus()
> directly (patch attached).
Really attached this time.
Thierry
From 2cedfcf38cdfe21688d1363659f28e271ce43358 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Thierry
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 02:20:35PM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> >> The PCI core can already deal with that. An MSI chip can be set per bus
> >> and the weak pcibios_add_bus() can be used to set that. Often it might
> >> not even be necessary to do it via pcibios_add_bus() if you create the
> >> root
On Fri, Sep 26, 2014 at 11:42:23AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> >> I am actually in disagreement with you, Thierry. I don't like the general
> >> direction
> >> of the patches, or at least I don't like the fact that we don't have a
> >> portable
> >> way of setting up the msi_chip without having t
>> The PCI core can already deal with that. An MSI chip can be set per bus
>> and the weak pcibios_add_bus() can be used to set that. Often it might
>> not even be necessary to do it via pcibios_add_bus() if you create the
>> root bus directly, since you can attach the MSI chip at that time.
>
> B
>> I am actually in disagreement with you, Thierry. I don't like the general
>> direction
>> of the patches, or at least I don't like the fact that we don't have a
>> portable
>> way of setting up the msi_chip without having to rely on weak architectural
>> hooks.
>
> Oh, good. That's actually
On 2014/9/25 22:23, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:10AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
>> This series is based Bjorn's pci/msi branch
>> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git pci/msi
>
> Is there a git tree for these patches?
Hi Konrad, my git tree
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 06:49:38PM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 03:48:55PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:42:36AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:10AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> > > > This series is based Bjorn's
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:42:36AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:10AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> > This series is based Bjorn's pci/msi branch
> > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git pci/msi
> >
> > Currently, there are a lot of weak arch f
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 03:48:55PM +0100, Liviu Dudau wrote:
> On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 09:42:36AM +0200, Thierry Reding wrote:
> > On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:10AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> > > This series is based Bjorn's pci/msi branch
> > > git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helga
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:10AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> This series is based Bjorn's pci/msi branch
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git pci/msi
Is there a git tree for these patches?
>
> Currently, there are a lot of weak arch functions in MSI code.
> Thierry Re
On Thu, Sep 25, 2014 at 11:14:10AM +0800, Yijing Wang wrote:
> This series is based Bjorn's pci/msi branch
> git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git pci/msi
>
> Currently, there are a lot of weak arch functions in MSI code.
> Thierry Reding Introduced MSI chip framework to co
This series is based Bjorn's pci/msi branch
git://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/helgaas/pci.git pci/msi
Currently, there are a lot of weak arch functions in MSI code.
Thierry Reding Introduced MSI chip framework to configure MSI/MSI-X in arm.
This series use MSI chip framework to refacto
21 matches
Mail list logo
