Hi, Jean,
On Tue, Jun 16, 2020 at 10:28:19AM +0200, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 05:41:29PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> > diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> > index 64ede5f150dc..5778db3aa42d 100644
> > --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> > +++
On Fri, Jun 12, 2020 at 05:41:29PM -0700, Fenghua Yu wrote:
> diff --git a/include/linux/mm_types.h b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> index 64ede5f150dc..5778db3aa42d 100644
> --- a/include/linux/mm_types.h
> +++ b/include/linux/mm_types.h
> @@ -538,6 +538,10 @@ struct mm_struct {
> atomic
PASID is shared by all threads in a process. So the logical place to keep
track of it is in the "mm". Both ARM and X86 need to use the PASID in the
"mm".
Suggested-by: Christoph Hellwig
Signed-off-by: Fenghua Yu
Reviewed-by: Tony Luck
---
v2:
- This new patch moves "pasid" from x86 specific mm_