On 27/06/18 18:46, Rob Herring wrote:
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 11:59 AM Jean-Philippe Brucker
wrote:
On 25/06/18 20:27, Rob Herring wrote:
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 08:06:51PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
A virtio-mmio node may represent a virtio-iommu device. This is discovered
by the
On Tue, Jun 26, 2018 at 11:59 AM Jean-Philippe Brucker
wrote:
>
> On 25/06/18 20:27, Rob Herring wrote:
> > On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 08:06:51PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> >> A virtio-mmio node may represent a virtio-iommu device. This is discovered
> >> by the virtio driver at probe
On 25/06/18 20:27, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 08:06:51PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
>> A virtio-mmio node may represent a virtio-iommu device. This is discovered
>> by the virtio driver at probe time, but the DMA topology isn't
>> discoverable and must be described by
On Thu, Jun 21, 2018 at 08:06:51PM +0100, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
> A virtio-mmio node may represent a virtio-iommu device. This is discovered
> by the virtio driver at probe time, but the DMA topology isn't
> discoverable and must be described by firmware. For DT the standard IOMMU
>
A virtio-mmio node may represent a virtio-iommu device. This is discovered
by the virtio driver at probe time, but the DMA topology isn't
discoverable and must be described by firmware. For DT the standard IOMMU
description is used, as specified in bindings/iommu/iommu.txt and
