Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support 52-bit virtual address

2018-02-27 Thread Robin Murphy
On 26/02/18 18:05, Will Deacon wrote: On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 04:58:53PM +, Robin Murphy wrote: Stage 1 input addresses are effectively 64-bit in SMMUv3 anyway, so really all that's involved is letting io-pgtable know the appropriate upper bound for T0SZ. Tested-by: Nate Watterson Signed-o

Re: [PATCH v2 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support 52-bit virtual address

2018-02-26 Thread Will Deacon
On Thu, Dec 14, 2017 at 04:58:53PM +, Robin Murphy wrote: > Stage 1 input addresses are effectively 64-bit in SMMUv3 anyway, so > really all that's involved is letting io-pgtable know the appropriate > upper bound for T0SZ. > > Tested-by: Nate Watterson > Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy > --- >

[PATCH v2 4/4] iommu/arm-smmu-v3: Support 52-bit virtual address

2017-12-14 Thread Robin Murphy
Stage 1 input addresses are effectively 64-bit in SMMUv3 anyway, so really all that's involved is letting io-pgtable know the appropriate upper bound for T0SZ. Tested-by: Nate Watterson Signed-off-by: Robin Murphy --- v2: No change drivers/iommu/arm-smmu-v3.c | 8 1 file changed, 8 i