On 4/9/2021 12:32 PM, Konrad Rzeszutek Wilk wrote:
> On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 08:13:07PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>>
>>
>> On 3/24/2021 1:42 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 06:53:49PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
When SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE is used, there should re
On Thu, Apr 08, 2021 at 08:13:07PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>
>
> On 3/24/2021 1:42 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 06:53:49PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> >> When SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE is used, there should really be no allocations of
> >> default_nslabs to occur si
On 3/24/2021 1:42 AM, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 06:53:49PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
>> When SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE is used, there should really be no allocations of
>> default_nslabs to occur since we are not going to use those slabs. If a
>> platform was somehow setting
On Mon, Mar 22, 2021 at 06:53:49PM -0700, Florian Fainelli wrote:
> When SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE is used, there should really be no allocations of
> default_nslabs to occur since we are not going to use those slabs. If a
> platform was somehow setting swiotlb_no_force and a later call to
> swiotlb_init()
When SWIOTLB_NO_FORCE is used, there should really be no allocations of
default_nslabs to occur since we are not going to use those slabs. If a
platform was somehow setting swiotlb_no_force and a later call to
swiotlb_init() was to be made we would still be proceeding with
allocating the default SW
