On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 1:17 PM Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>
> On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:17:50PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> > Do you think I should fix this and rebase on the latest linux-next
> > now? I wonder if there are more factor and clean up coming and I
> > should wait after that.
>
> Her
On Fri, Feb 26, 2021 at 12:17:50PM +0800, Claire Chang wrote:
> Do you think I should fix this and rebase on the latest linux-next
> now? I wonder if there are more factor and clean up coming and I
> should wait after that.
Here is my preferred plan:
1) wait for my series to support the min alig
> diff --git a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> index fd9c1bd183ac..8b77fd64199e 100644
> --- a/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> +++ b/kernel/dma/swiotlb.c
> @@ -836,6 +836,40 @@ late_initcall(swiotlb_create_default_debugfs);
> #endif
>
> #ifdef CONFIG_DMA_RESTRICTED_POOL
> +struct page *dev_s
Add the functions, dev_swiotlb_{alloc,free} to support the memory
allocation from restricted DMA pool.
Signed-off-by: Claire Chang
---
include/linux/swiotlb.h | 2 ++
kernel/dma/direct.c | 30 ++
kernel/dma/swiotlb.c| 34 ++
3
