On Mon, 07 Oct 2013 08:44:54 -0500, Rob Herring wrote:
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Cho KyongHo
> > ---
> > .../bindings/iommu/samsung,exynos4210-sysmmu.txt | 103 +++
> > arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 122
> > a
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Cho KyongHo
> ---
> .../bindings/iommu/samsung,exynos4210-sysmmu.txt | 103 +++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 122
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 25 ++
> arch
Ok
---Sent from Boxer | http://getboxer.com
Hi Marek,
On Tue, Aug 6, 2013 at 6:17 AM, Marek Szyprowski
wrote:
...
> IMHO it is much better to have a simple driver, which binds to a single
> IOMMU controller and leave it to the driver whether to have a same virtual
> address
> space fo
> -Original Message-
> From: Rob Herring [mailto:robherri...@gmail.com]
> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 10:55 PM
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Cho KyongHo
> > ---
> > .../bindings/iommu/samsung,exynos4210-sysmmu.txt | 103 +++
> > arch/ar
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 6:28 AM, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Cho KyongHo
> ---
> .../bindings/iommu/samsung,exynos4210-sysmmu.txt | 103 +++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 122
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 25 ++
> arch
> -Original Message-
> From: grund...@google.com [mailto:grund...@google.com] On Behalf Of Grant
> Grundler
> Sent: Saturday, July 27, 2013 2:58 AM
>
> On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> > Signed-off-by: Cho KyongHo
> > ---
> > .../bindings/iommu/samsung,exynos4210-s
On Fri, Jul 26, 2013 at 4:28 AM, Cho KyongHo wrote:
> Signed-off-by: Cho KyongHo
> ---
> .../bindings/iommu/samsung,exynos4210-sysmmu.txt | 103 +++
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4.dtsi | 122
> arch/arm/boot/dts/exynos4210.dtsi | 25 ++
> arch