This patchset adds IMP DEF event support for the SMMUv3 PMCG.
It is marked as an RFC as the method to identify the PMCG implementation
may be a quite disliked. And, in general, the series is somewhat
incomplete.
So the background is that the PMCG supports IMP DEF events, yet we have no
method to
Hi John,
On 30/09/2019 15:33, John Garry wrote:
This patchset adds IMP DEF event support for the SMMUv3 PMCG.
It is marked as an RFC as the method to identify the PMCG implementation
may be a quite disliked. And, in general, the series is somewhat
incomplete.
So the background is that the PMCG
On 15/10/2019 19:00, Robin Murphy wrote:
Hi John,
On 30/09/2019 15:33, John Garry wrote:
This patchset adds IMP DEF event support for the SMMUv3 PMCG.
It is marked as an RFC as the method to identify the PMCG implementation
may be a quite disliked. And, in general, the series is somewhat
incom
On 2019-10-16 9:47 am, John Garry wrote:
On 15/10/2019 19:00, Robin Murphy wrote:
Hi John,
On 30/09/2019 15:33, John Garry wrote:
This patchset adds IMP DEF event support for the SMMUv3 PMCG.
It is marked as an RFC as the method to identify the PMCG implementation
may be a quite disliked. And
Hi Robin,
Two significant concerns right off the bat:
- It seems more common than not for silicon designers to fail to
implement IIDR correctly, so it's only a matter of time before
inevitably needing to bring back some firmware-level identifier
abstraction (if not already - does Hi161x have
