Hi Alex,
On 6/18/20 11:03 PM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:52:56 +0800
Lu Baolu wrote:
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the report.
On 6/18/20 4:06 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2020 14:21:01 +0800
Lu Baolu wrote:
From: Tom Murphy
There's no need for the non-dma_ops
On Thu, 18 Jun 2020 09:52:56 +0800
Lu Baolu wrote:
> Hi Alex,
>
> Thanks for the report.
>
> On 6/18/20 4:06 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
> > On Sat, 16 May 2020 14:21:01 +0800
> > Lu Baolu wrote:
> >
> >> From: Tom Murphy
> >>
> >> There's no need for the non-dma_ops path to keep track of IO
Hi Alex,
Thanks for the report.
On 6/18/20 4:06 AM, Alex Williamson wrote:
On Sat, 16 May 2020 14:21:01 +0800
Lu Baolu wrote:
From: Tom Murphy
There's no need for the non-dma_ops path to keep track of IOVAs. The
whole point of the non-dma_ops path is that it allows the IOVAs to be
handled s
On Sat, 16 May 2020 14:21:01 +0800
Lu Baolu wrote:
> From: Tom Murphy
>
> There's no need for the non-dma_ops path to keep track of IOVAs. The
> whole point of the non-dma_ops path is that it allows the IOVAs to be
> handled separately. The IOVA handling code removed in this patch is
> pointles
