On Tue, 14 Apr 2020, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> > I'll rely on Christoph to determine whether it makes sense to add some
> > periodic scavening of the atomic pools, whether that's needed for this to
> > be merged, or wheter we should enforce some maximum pool size.
>
> I don't really see the po
On Fri, Apr 10, 2020 at 12:37:20PM -0700, David Rientjes wrote:
> I'll rely on Christoph to determine whether it makes sense to add some
> periodic scavening of the atomic pools, whether that's needed for this to
> be merged, or wheter we should enforce some maximum pool size.
I don't really see
On Fri, 10 Apr 2020, Hillf Danton wrote:
>
> On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:21:06 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote:
> >
> > When an atomic pool becomes fully depleted because it is now relied upon
> > for all non-blocking allocations through the DMA API, allow background
> > expansion of each pool by a k
On Wed, 8 Apr 2020 14:21:06 -0700 (PDT) David Rientjes wrote:
>
> When an atomic pool becomes fully depleted because it is now relied upon
> for all non-blocking allocations through the DMA API, allow background
> expansion of each pool by a kworker.
>
> When an atomic pool has less than the de
When an atomic pool becomes fully depleted because it is now relied upon
for all non-blocking allocations through the DMA API, allow background
expansion of each pool by a kworker.
When an atomic pool has less than the default size of memory left, kick
off a kworker to dynamically expand the pool
