On Fri, Mar 08, 2013 at 10:53:16AM +0800, Andrew Cooks wrote:
> I'm hoping one of the veteran developers would give some guidance for
> the best approach to enable more devices in future.
In cases like this where a device just uses the request-id of another
device you can make use of the existing
On Thu, Mar 7, 2013 at 5:25 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
> Hi Andrew
>
> Andrew Cooks writes:
>
>> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin
>> wrote:
>>>
>>> [ Sending this to the MVUMI driver authors and the IOMMU list as I can't
>>> tell which part is at fault. ]
>>>
>>> [ ... ]
>>>
Hi Andrew
Andrew Cooks writes:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin
> wrote:
>>
>> [ Sending this to the MVUMI driver authors and the IOMMU list as I can't
>> tell which part is at fault. ]
>>
>> [ ... ]
>> [4.342079] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
>> [4.342132
On Wed, 2013-03-06 at 10:48 +0800, Andrew Cooks wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin
> wrote:
> >
> > [ Sending this to the MVUMI driver authors and the IOMMU list as I can't
> > tell which part is at fault. ]
> >
> > [ ... ]
> > [4.342079] dmar: DRHD: handling fault sta
On Tue, Mar 5, 2013 at 11:03 PM, Gaudenz Steinlin wrote:
>
> [ Sending this to the MVUMI driver authors and the IOMMU list as I can't
> tell which part is at fault. ]
>
> [ ... ]
> [4.342079] dmar: DRHD: handling fault status reg 2
> [4.342132] dmar: DMAR:[DMA Read] Request device [02:00.0
