On 2022/3/21 20:05, Jason Gunthorpe wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 02:40:25PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
+/**
+ * iommu_sva_bind_device() - Bind a process address space to a device
+ * @dev: the device
+ * @mm: the mm to bind, caller must hold a reference to it
+ * @drvdata: opaque data pointer to
On 2022/3/21 19:33, Jean-Philippe Brucker wrote:
On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 02:40:25PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c
index 106506143896..47cf98e661ff 100644
--- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c
+++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c
@@
On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 02:40:25PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> +/**
> + * iommu_sva_bind_device() - Bind a process address space to a device
> + * @dev: the device
> + * @mm: the mm to bind, caller must hold a reference to it
> + * @drvdata: opaque data pointer to pass to bind callback
> + *
> + * Cr
On Mon, Mar 21, 2022 at 07:01:45PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> > one domain can be attached by multiple devices, so this should not be
> > a blind alloc.
>
> Indeed. Perhaps we could associate the SVA domain with the mm->pasid and
> add a user counter inside the domain.
This has the same problem as
On Sun, Mar 20, 2022 at 02:40:25PM +0800, Lu Baolu wrote:
> diff --git a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c
> index 106506143896..47cf98e661ff 100644
> --- a/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c
> +++ b/drivers/iommu/iommu-sva-lib.c
> @@ -3,6 +3,8 @@
> * Helpers for IOMMU driv
On 2022/3/21 16:04, Tian, Kevin wrote:
From: Lu Baolu
Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 2:40 PM
+struct iommu_sva *
+iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, void
*drvdata)
+{
+ int ret = -EINVAL;
+ struct iommu_sva *handle;
+ struct iommu_domain *domain;
+
+
> From: Lu Baolu
> Sent: Sunday, March 20, 2022 2:40 PM
> +struct iommu_sva *
> +iommu_sva_bind_device(struct device *dev, struct mm_struct *mm, void
> *drvdata)
> +{
> + int ret = -EINVAL;
> + struct iommu_sva *handle;
> + struct iommu_domain *domain;
> +
> + handle = kzalloc(size
