On 27/11/2018 07:37, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:58:04PM -0800, Robin Murphy wrote:
On 2018-11-15 11:50 am, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:52:38AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Can I get a quick review from the arm64 folks? I think it should
be fine
On Thu, Nov 15, 2018 at 12:58:04PM -0800, Robin Murphy wrote:
> On 2018-11-15 11:50 am, Will Deacon wrote:
>> On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:52:38AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
>>> Can I get a quick review from the arm64 folks? I think it should
>>> be fine there as it basically is a code move,
On 2018-11-15 11:50 am, Will Deacon wrote:
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:52:38AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
Can I get a quick review from the arm64 folks? I think it should
be fine there as it basically is a code move, but an additional pair
or two of eyes always helps to weed out bugs.
I
On Fri, Nov 09, 2018 at 08:52:38AM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Can I get a quick review from the arm64 folks? I think it should
> be fine there as it basically is a code move, but an additional pair
> or two of eyes always helps to weed out bugs.
I reviewed the arm64 parts, but it would be
Can I get a quick review from the arm64 folks? I think it should
be fine there as it basically is a code move, but an additional pair
or two of eyes always helps to weed out bugs.
On Mon, Nov 05, 2018 at 01:19:22PM +0100, Christoph Hellwig wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> this series moves the existing
Hi all,
this series moves the existing arm64 implementation of arch_dma_alloc and
arch_dma_free to common code given that it is not arm64-specific, and
then also uses it for csky. Given how many architectures remap memory
for the DMA coherent implementation it should be usable for many more,
and
