On 11/03/17 17:05, Mats Wichmann wrote:
> iotivity: the uses seem to numerically mostly be in example code, where
> a lot of this sort of activity happens, but doesn't really matter that
> much: these are to show people iotivity working, not to be part of a
> shipped product.
some statistics:
I
On 11/03/17 15:36, Thiago Macieira wrote:
> On quinta-feira, 2 de novembro de 2017 15:29:22 PDT Nash, George wrote:
>> Comments on the secure coding guidelines.
>>
>> Under the banned C functions:
>> --
>> scanf() & family. Why not list the family of fun
On quinta-feira, 2 de novembro de 2017 15:29:22 PDT Nash, George wrote:
> Comments on the secure coding guidelines.
>
> Under the banned C functions:
> --
> scanf() & family. Why not list the family of functions? Its best to be
> explicit. This is the
Comments on the secure coding guidelines.
Under the banned C functions:
--
scanf() & family. Why not list the family of functions? Its best to be
explicit. This is the only one on the list that causes some confusion for me.
Not because I don't see ho
