In particular, check out:
http://fasterdata.es.net/host-tuning/100g-tuning/
Your results are pretty typical.
On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 14:16 Jeffrey Lane wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 17, 2018 at 3:09 PM, Bruce A. Mah wrote:
> > If memory serves me right, Jeffrey Lane wrote:
> >> Hi all,
> >>
> >> I ha
This might be useful:
https://fasterdata.es.net/network-tuning/udp-tuning/
On Sat, Feb 3, 2018 at 09:48 Fran Terlingo (fterling)
wrote:
> IPerf Experts,
>
>
>
> I am performing tests between an iPerf 3.1.3 client running on a Linux
> Ubuntu Virtual machine on a VMware ESX host and a similar se
d's most
> engaging tech sites, Slashdot.org! http://sdm.link/slashdot
> ___
> Iperf-users mailing list
> Iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net
> https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/iperf-users
>
>
--
Brian Tierney, http://ww
-fq.8.html
>
> George
>
> From: on behalf of Arman Mohsin <
> arman.mohsi...@gmail.com>
> Date: Sunday, May 14, 2017 at 4:46 PM
> To: Brian Tierney
> Cc: "iperf-...@googlegroups.com" , "
> iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net" , "
> perfsonar-u
width for TCP as
> well or is it ONLY for UDP? I tried to read the documentation in the man
> page but it is a bit confusing. In the earlier versions of iperf the -b
> option is used to test only UDP but I am not sure if it supports in the
> latest version (iperf3)
>
>
> Reg
this:
>
> iperf3 -c $SERVER_ADDRESS -p $PORT -t $TIME -i $INTERVAL -f m
> --no-fq-socket-pacing -N -Z
>
> Am i doing it wrong?
>
> On Tue, Mar 14, 2017 at 6:56 PM, Brian Tierney wrote:
>
>>
>> Seems to work fine for me.
>>
>> Are you using it with th
3.1.3.
>
> Thanks in advance.
>
>
> Arman
>
>
>
>
--
Brian Tierney, http://www.es.net/tierney
Energy Sciences Network (ESnet), Berkeley National Lab
http://fasterdata.es.net
--
Check out the v
endor support for NetFlow,
>> J-Flow, sFlow and other flows. Make informed decisions using capacity
>> planning reports.
>> https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/305295220;132659582;e
>> ___
>> Iperf-users mailing list
>> I
