Re: [Iperf-users] Iperf usage in Telecom network testing

2017-06-20 Thread Bob McMahon via Iperf-users
> Regards, > > Joydev > > > > *From:* Bob McMahon [mailto:bob.mcma...@broadcom.com] > *Sent:* 19 June 2017 20:34 > *To:* Jana, Joydev > *Cc:* iperf-users@lists.sourceforge.net > *Subject:* Re: [Iperf-users] Iperf usage in Telecom network testing > > > >

Re: [Iperf-users] Iperf usage in Telecom network testing

2017-06-20 Thread Jana, Joydev
-users@lists.sourceforge.net Subject: Re: [Iperf-users] Iperf usage in Telecom network testing Hi Joydev, Yes, the number of physical ports is limited by the hardware/host. The number of iperf flows is not, i.e. a single host can have multiple iperf streams. As standard testing there are no

Re: [Iperf-users] Iperf usage in Telecom network testing

2017-06-19 Thread Bob McMahon via Iperf-users
Hi Joydev, Yes, the number of physical ports is limited by the hardware/host. The number of iperf flows is not, i.e. a single host can have multiple iperf streams. As standard testing there are no switches which iperf is compiled for. One would have to talk with the switch vendor to have them s

[Iperf-users] Iperf usage in Telecom network testing

2017-06-19 Thread Jana, Joydev
Hello, We are investigating the possibility to use any open source IP traffic generator/Analyser app that can be installed in any device to be able to verify error free flow. Reading through the documentation of Iperf, this tool is possible to do so when installed into Client/server setup which