Re: [Ipmitool-devel] IPMI SOL configuration / IPMI spec

2007-09-13 Thread David A. Ranch
Heh.. fair enough but it seems we agree that the IPMI 2.0 spec is getting outdated.  If we could create a standard for video/KVM support, IPv6 compatiblility, etc., I think the world would be a more manageable place. --David What Intel thinks? Perhaps that's too broad. Anyway, here's wh

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] IPMI SOL configuration / IPMI spec

2007-09-13 Thread Al Chu
On Thu, 2007-09-13 at 08:45 -0700, David A. Ranch wrote: > I'm curious what Intel thinks of proprietary extensions from vendors > such as Supermicro, Dell, etc. that gives a video or "KVM" transport > over IPMI? I personally use Linux so the standard text "sol" transport > is fine but for heavy

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] IPMI SOL configuration / IPMI spec

2007-09-13 Thread Cress, Andrew R
What Intel thinks? Perhaps that's too broad. Anyway, here's what I think. We have BMCs that add video/KVM support and there are other BMC vendors doing that also. It's a neat feature. That and other value-adds differentiate newer BMCs for out-of-band management above and beyond the IPMI 2.0 ca

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] IPMI SOL configuration / IPMI spec

2007-09-13 Thread David A. Ranch
I'm curious what Intel thinks of proprietary extensions from vendors such as Supermicro, Dell, etc. that gives a video or "KVM" transport over IPMI? I personally use Linux so the standard text "sol" transport is fine but for heavy Windows environments, you really need a GUI "console" to be ab

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] IPMI SOL configuration / IPMI spec

2007-09-13 Thread Cress, Andrew R
Holger, Good question, but I don't know the answer. Perhaps someone directly involved in the planning for IPMI spec updates can answer. Try http://www.intel.com/design/servers/ipmi/feedback.htm Andy From: Liebig, Holger [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Sent: Thu

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] TR: dual bridge support

2007-09-13 Thread Dmitry Frolov
* Audet, Jean-Michel <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12.09.2007 21:52]: > Not sure I understand correctly the private and native. Under private I mean src/plugins/open/open.h header in ipmitool tree, native means /usr/include/linux/ipmi.h on Linux and /usr/include/sys/ipmi.h on FreeBSD. If You look at the b

[Ipmitool-devel] Error-Messages in ipmitool sensor output

2007-09-13 Thread Gregor Dschung
Hi, I've got a few problems with ipmitool (tested with v1.8.6 and v1.8.8). Description: I use a HP ProLiant DL140G3 w/ IPMI-Features. When I try to get sensor-values thought OpenIPMI, everything works fine (Appendix A). But when I try to get sensor-values over RCMP, or RCPM+, I get some error mes

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] Patch for Raritan OEM commands

2007-09-13 Thread Thomas Rendelmann
Dmitry Frolov wrote: > * Thomas Rendelmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> [12.09.2007 > 14:25]: > > > Hi, > > > > Attached is a patch against 1.8.9 which adds Raritan specific > > OEM commands. We added these commands to ipmitool to manage > > our devices (e.g. firmware upgrade, read firmware version) etc.