Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.12 release this week

2012-08-08 Thread Carson Gaspar
On 8/7/12 8:56 PM, Zdenek Styblik wrote: > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Carson Gaspar > wrote: >> Where does the struct_member_name: value syntax even come from? Every > > Can you post stdout/stderr/logs? My guess is this is not a problem, > but rather pre-processor/compi

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.12 release this week

2012-08-08 Thread Carson Gaspar
On 8/8/12 8:54 AM, Jim Mankovich wrote: > Carson, > > The struct_member_name:value syntax was obsoleted in GCC 2.5 See: > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.1/gcc/Designated-Inits.html#Designated-Inits > > The right thing to do is to change these to .struct_member_name = > value syntax, which is

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.12 release this week

2012-08-07 Thread Carson Gaspar
On 8/7/12 2:54 PM, Jim Mankovich wrote: > Carson, > > Does 1.8.11 compile without issue on Studio compilers on Sol 11? No - it looks like lib/ipmi_mc.c has been gcc only for a long time now :-( Where does the struct_member_name: value syntax even come from? Every reference I can find uses .struc

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.12 release this week

2012-08-07 Thread Carson Gaspar
The code is full of gcc-isms: From configure.in: CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fno-strict-aliasing -Wreturn-type -Wno-unused-result -Wno-packed-bitfield-compat" In additon to the gcc-specific flags, it fails to build with the Studio compilers on Sol 11, spewing tons of errors similar to: "../include/ipmi

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] New ipmi watchdog daemon

2006-09-28 Thread Carson Gaspar
--On Thursday, September 28, 2006 8:45 PM -0500 Corey Minyard <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > I guess the big question in my mind is why you would ever want to stop > the watchdog daemon for long enough to allow the watchdog to go off. It > seems you are opening a window for an unprotected failure.