quot;
Sent: Monday, January 7, 2013 12:31:19 PM
Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] code analysis
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Ales Ledvinka wrote:
[...]
>> > Then it's about effort to generate the report,
>> > effort to check the reported item
>> > whether it's
On Mon, Jan 7, 2013 at 12:25 PM, Ales Ledvinka wrote:
[...]
>> > Then it's about effort to generate the report,
>> > effort to check the reported item
>> > whether it's security issue or not and effort to fix it. These are
>> > not the same thing.
>>
>> Right. And if you want to do it all behind t
- Original Message -
> From: "Zdenek Styblik"
> To: "Ales Ledvinka"
> Cc: "ipmitool-devel"
> Sent: Saturday, January 5, 2013 1:23:03 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] code analysis
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Ales Ledvinka
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 8:10 PM, Ales Ledvinka wrote:
[...]
> Per issue, file or defect type group?
>
It's hard to say in a general way. Sometimes one is better than
another and sometimes it's better to edit hell out of .c file.
[...]
>> > Reasonable minimal fix. If further question remain then a
- Original Message -
> From: "Zdenek Styblik"
> To: "Ales Ledvinka"
> Cc: "Jim Mank" , "ipmitool-devel"
>
> Sent: Friday, January 4, 2013 6:17:49 PM
> Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] code analysis
>
> On Fri, Jan 4, 20
Z & Ales,
I would agree that there should be tickets for the issues. In fact, there
may already be tickets for some of the issues found by the analysis.
Not having any info yet on what the code analysis shows, its pretty hard
to have any feeling for what, if anything, might really need to be fi
On Fri, Jan 4, 2013 at 5:48 PM, Ales Ledvinka wrote:
>
>> I don't know how much I can help with the
>> fixing, but if I have
>> time I'll do what I can.
>
> You are welcome. Send me mail with the list of files you are going to touch.
I hope you two will find a better way than this. Like creating
> I don't know how much I can help with the
> fixing, but if I have
> time I'll do what I can.
You are welcome. Send me mail with the list of files you are going to touch.
> I'm curious as to how will you determine which issues to fix?
Reasonable minimal fix. If further question remain then add
Ales,
I am interested in understanding what kind of issues show up in the report, so
please
send it my way. I'm not familiar with "rawhide code analysis", so will I be
able to
understand the report? I don't know how much I can help with the fixing, but
if I have
time I'll do what I can.
I'
Hello,
I just joined the team. I have here the ipmitool Fedora 19 rawhide code
analysis report.
The report is for 1.8.12 with two picked cvs patches so it's not cvs but close
to fix there.
I did not review the report for security issues, false positives or severity.
If you are a sf ipmitool deve
10 matches
Mail list logo
