Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.12 release this week

2012-08-08 Thread Carson Gaspar
On 8/7/12 8:56 PM, Zdenek Styblik wrote: > On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Carson Gaspar > wrote: >> Where does the struct_member_name: value syntax even come from? Every > > Can you post stdout/stderr/logs? My guess is this is not a problem, > but rather pre-processor/compiler tripping all over

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.12 release this week

2012-08-08 Thread Carson Gaspar
On 8/8/12 8:54 AM, Jim Mankovich wrote: > Carson, > > The struct_member_name:value syntax was obsoleted in GCC 2.5 See: > http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.1/gcc/Designated-Inits.html#Designated-Inits > > The right thing to do is to change these to .struct_member_name = > value syntax, which is

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.12 release this week

2012-08-08 Thread Jim Mankovich
Carson, The struct_member_name:value syntax was obsoleted in GCC 2.5 See: http://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc-4.4.1/gcc/Designated-Inits.html#Designated-Inits The right thing to do is to change these to .struct_member_name = value syntax, which is what you mentioned you did. I think the delloem

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.12 release this week

2012-08-07 Thread Zdenek Styblik
On Wed, Aug 8, 2012 at 3:19 AM, Carson Gaspar wrote: > No - it looks like lib/ipmi_mc.c has been gcc only for a long time now :-( > lib/ipmi_mc.c hasn't been touched for 2 years and 3 months. ipmitool-1.8.11 is out for 3 years and 6 months. Actually, which version of ipmitool can you compile at S

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.12 release this week

2012-08-07 Thread Carson Gaspar
On 8/7/12 2:54 PM, Jim Mankovich wrote: > Carson, > > Does 1.8.11 compile without issue on Studio compilers on Sol 11? No - it looks like lib/ipmi_mc.c has been gcc only for a long time now :-( Where does the struct_member_name: value syntax even come from? Every reference I can find uses .struc

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.12 release this week

2012-08-07 Thread Jim Mankovich
Carson, Does 1.8.11 compile without issue on Studio compilers on Sol 11? -- Jim Mankovich | jm...@hp.com -- On 8/7/2012 2:32 PM, Carson Gaspar wrote: > The code is full of gcc-isms: > > From configure.in: > > CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fno-strict-aliasing -Wreturn-type -Wno-unused-result > -Wno-packed-b

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.12 release this week

2012-08-07 Thread Jim Mankovich
Carson, It should compile as it did before if the -W options on the CFLAGS are removed. I will remove the gcc dependent -W arguments from CFLAGS in configure.in Is there a way to get better compiler warning messages across all the compilers used to build ipmitool? Jim -- Jim Mankovich | jm...

Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.12 release this week

2012-08-07 Thread Carson Gaspar
The code is full of gcc-isms: From configure.in: CFLAGS="$CFLAGS -fno-strict-aliasing -Wreturn-type -Wno-unused-result -Wno-packed-bitfield-compat" In additon to the gcc-specific flags, it fails to build with the Studio compilers on Sol 11, spewing tons of errors similar to: "../include/ipmi

[Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool 1.8.12 release this week

2012-08-07 Thread Jim Mankovich
All, I've updated the ipmitool ChangeLog with information about what has changed since 1.8.11, tagged all the source files in the cvs tree with IPMITOOL_1_8_12, and changed the version in configure.in to 1.8.12.I'm running some of my own regression tests and if all goes I'll make a 1.8.12 t