No, I'm not taking over Petter's duties. I produce all these packages
for Sun internally-- I just don't mind sharing. I don't have access to
debian to upload packages.
On Wed, 2007-03-07 at 09:51 +0100, Steffen Grunewald wrote:
> On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:58:51PM -0800, John Blair wrote:
> > I'
Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Carol Hebert]
>> Testing has been been completed (successfully ;-) by everyone helping to
>> proof the code for the roll to 1.8.9 and all have given the code
>> currently in the cvs tree the go-ahead to become the next ipmitool
>> release! :-) Can you please roll the
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 03:58:51PM -0800, John Blair wrote:
> I'll also be building a debian package once I update the debian
> changelog.
Ah, John, I didn't read this far before... so you're taking over Petter's
duties?
Will you be able to upload the Debian package before Etch will be going
into
On Tue, Mar 06, 2007 at 11:43:28PM +0100, Petter Reinholdtsen wrote:
> [Carol Hebert]
> > Testing has been been completed (successfully ;-) by everyone helping to
> > proof the code for the roll to 1.8.9 and all have given the code
> > currently in the cvs tree the go-ahead to become the next ipmit
What OSes do you want to support for RPM packages?
I can build you a set for Centos 4.4 and FC3 if you'd like.
--david
Hi Petter,
That's wonderful! Thank you, thank you!! :-D I'm sure the rest of us
can make the rpms for you to post over the next week or so. I will try
to make several of
I have all of these built and I'm happy to share:
ipmitool-1.8.9-1.fc5.i386.rpm
ipmitool-1.8.9-1.fc5.x86_64.rpm
ipmitool-1.8.9-1.rhel3.i386.rpm
ipmitool-1.8.9-1.rhel3.x86_64.rpm
ipmitool-1.8.9-1.rhel4.i386.rpm
ipmitool-1.8.9-1.rhel4.x86_64.rpm
ipmitool-1.8.9-1.sles9.i386.rpm
ipmitool-1.8.9-1.sles9
Hi Petter,
That's wonderful! Thank you, thank you!! :-D I'm sure the rest of us
can make the rpms for you to post over the next week or so. I will try
to make several of them asap.
Thanks again for your help, :-)
Carol
P.S. Could you also please update the ipmitool home page to list and
po
[Carol Hebert]
> Testing has been been completed (successfully ;-) by everyone helping to
> proof the code for the roll to 1.8.9 and all have given the code
> currently in the cvs tree the go-ahead to become the next ipmitool
> release! :-) Can you please roll the code to 1.8.9 now?
Done. The s
Hi Petter,
Testing has been been completed (successfully ;-) by everyone helping to
proof the code for the roll to 1.8.9 and all have given the code
currently in the cvs tree the go-ahead to become the next ipmitool
release! :-) Can you please roll the code to 1.8.9 now? I believe
Duncan normal
Carol,
Sorry, I should have noted that I did testing before I checked it in.
We're good-to-go.
-j.
On Tue, 2007-03-06 at 11:44 -0800, Carol Hebert wrote:
> Hi John,
>
> I saw that you submitted your patch over the weekend. Is your big
> endian regression testing complete?
>
> Thanks,
>
> C
Hi John,
I saw that you submitted your patch over the weekend. Is your big
endian regression testing complete?
Thanks,
Carol
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 12:50 -0800, John Blair wrote:
> Carol,
>
> Thanks. I will try to take care of this today.
>
-
Excellent -- thanks. I think there are many of us who are very anxious
to finally get 1.8.9 rolled up and out. :-)
Carol
On Fri, 2007-03-02 at 12:50 -0800, John Blair wrote:
> Carol,
>
> Thanks. I will try to take care of this today.
>
> Regarding the LOG_DAEMON fix... I suspected selling th
Carol,
Thanks. I will try to take care of this today.
Regarding the LOG_DAEMON fix... I suspected selling that change might be
difficult. I think the right thing to do is probably to make it a
run-time configuration option, rather than change it in the source
code. I will write a patch and
Hi John,
Thanks very much for being so helpful with the coordination of the 1.8.9
roll. IMHO, you've had your patch posted for several days now and I
haven't seen anyone (else) raise any concerns or objections to it. I
just have general concerns about making any code changes at all now that
the
Yes, I would very much like that. I can go ahead and check it in if you
give me the go ahead.
Carol Hebert wrote On 03/01/07 14:36,:
>Hi,
>
>John, do you need to submit your big endian patch before we roll to 1.8.9?
>
>Thanks,
>
>Carol
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
>
Hi,
John, do you need to submit your big endian patch before we roll to 1.8.9?
Thanks,
Carol
-
Take Surveys. Earn Cash. Influence the Future of IT
Join SourceForge.net's Techsay panel and you'll get the chance to sha
Hi,
It looks like the regression testing on the 2/26 cvs tree has passed
successfully we're ready to roll to 1.8.9 with that code!! I'm afraid
to even breathe on the code now. :-} Would it be possible to wait
with (one or both of) these patches until we roll or is it really
critical to
on
Cc : ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED]; Carol Hebert
Objet : Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool v1.8.9 ready to roll?
Hi,
I am still trying to figure out what has changed. I am not able to
successfully transfer data when the retry-count and retry-interval is set to 0.
.
-Message d'origine-
De : Jarrod B Johnson [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Envoyé : Tuesday, February 27, 2007 11:28 AM
À : Audet, Jean-Michel
Cc : Carol Hebert; ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : Re: [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool v1.8.9 ready to roll?
The only thing I s
Hi,
Folks, have you looked over the small patches John posted on 2/22?
The first one is a big endian fix and the second one is a change to
ipmievd to use LOG_DAEMON.
IMHO, these are very small patches but what with it being the 11th
hour on the 1.8.9 release, it might be good if Francois I
Please ignore the previous question... I checked the tree and they have
not been committed. Is there any objection to adding them to this
build? I would very much like to get thim into 1.8.9.
thanks,
-john.
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 17:02 -0500, Carol Hebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've completed regres
Carol,
Are the patches I submitted committed?
-john.
On Mon, 2007-02-26 at 17:02 -0500, Carol Hebert wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I've completed regression testing of the 2/26/07 cvs tree on several
> different distros/kernels with no problems found. Does anyone else
> have any last regression tests to r
voyé : Monday, February 26, 2007 5:03 PM
> À : ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Objet : [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool v1.8.9 ready to roll?
>
>
> Hi,
>
> I've completed regression testing of the 2/26/07 cvs tree on several
> different distros/kernels w
On Tue, Feb 27, 2007 at 04:14:55PM +0100, Steffen Grunewald wrote:
> configure.in:388: required file `src/plugins/free/Makefile.in' not found
>
> What am I missing?
Answering myself: the src/plugins/free/ subdirectory which appeared only
a few days ago (and was not fetched by cvs update without -
> Hi,
>
> I've completed regression testing of the 2/26/07 cvs tree on several
> different distros/kernels with no problems found. Does anyone else
> have any last regression tests to run or can we roll the current cvs
> tree to v1.8.9?
>
> Thanks,
>
> Carol Hebert
Hmmm, just checked out and t
idea?
JM
-Message d'origine-
De : [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED] De la part de Carol Hebert
Envoyé : Monday, February 26, 2007 5:03 PM
À : ipmitool-devel@lists.sourceforge.net; [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Objet : [Ipmitool-devel] ipmitool v1.8.9 ready to roll?
Hi,
I've compl
Hi,
I've completed regression testing of the 2/26/07 cvs tree on several
different distros/kernels with no problems found. Does anyone else
have any last regression tests to run or can we roll the current cvs
tree to v1.8.9?
Thanks,
Carol Hebert
--
27 matches
Mail list logo
