From: John Philips [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 3:23 PM
To: [email protected]; Seger, Mark
Subject: RE: [Ipmitool-devel] performance questions
From: Seger, Mark
Subject: RE: [Ipmitool-devel] performance questions
To: "John Ph
From: Seger, Mark
Subject: RE: [Ipmitool-devel] performance questions
To: "John Philips" ,
"[email protected]"
Date: Friday, March 26, 2010, 11:01 AM
I was checking around internally and was told that on least our
systems there are 2 differe
hilips [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 1:12 PM
To: [email protected]; Seger, Mark
Subject: RE: [Ipmitool-devel] performance questions
Ok, must be something specific to Dell hardware, then. All our servers are
Dells of varying models. ipmitool sd
Ok, must be something specific to Dell hardware, then. All our servers are
Dells of varying models. ipmitool sdr runs fine w/1.8.9, slow as molaasses
w/1.8.11
--- On Fri, 3/26/10, Seger, Mark wrote:
From: Seger, Mark
Subject: RE: [Ipmitool-devel] performance questions
To: "John Ph
: [Ipmitool-devel] performance questions
Mark,
Try it again without the cache and see if there's any difference. I've never
used the cache feature before.
--- On Fri, 3/26/10, Seger, Mark wrote:
From: Seger, Mark
Subject: RE: [Ipmitool-devel] performance questions
To: "Seger
t;>> -Original Message-
>>>> From: Corey Minyard [mailto:[email protected]]
>>>> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 8:43 AM
>>>> To: Seger, Mark
>>>> Cc: [email protected]
>>>> Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] performance questions
Mark,
Try it again without the cache and see if there's any difference. I've never
used the cache feature before.
--- On Fri, 3/26/10, Seger, Mark wrote:
From: Seger, Mark
Subject: RE: [Ipmitool-devel] performance questions
To: "Seger, Mark" , "John Ph
in `seq 1 10`; do ipmitool -S xxx
sdr >/dev/null; done
real 0m19.212s
user 0m0.005s
sys 0m0.008s
From: Seger, Mark
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 10:15 AM
To: John Philips; [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] performance questions
From: John Philips [mailto:john
---
>> From: Corey Minyard [mailto:[email protected]]
>> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 8:43 AM
>> To: Seger, Mark
>> Cc: [email protected]
>> Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] performance questions
>>
>> Seger, Mark wrote:
>&g
From: John Philips [mailto:[email protected]]
Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 9:57 AM
To: [email protected]
Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] performance questions
I'm seeing the same problem. My systems are Dell PowerEdge servers running
Gentoo. When using ipmitool
caused by something within
ipmitool.
--- On Thu, 3/25/10, Seger, Mark wrote:
From: Seger, Mark
Subject: [Ipmitool-devel] performance questions
To: "[email protected]"
Date: Thursday, March 25, 2010, 5:01 AM
I’ve been using ipmitool inside my collectl
ce/2mins) w/ cache in under a minute.
>>
>> -mark
>>
>>
>>> -Original Message-
>>> From: Corey Minyard [mailto:[email protected]]
>>> Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 8:43 AM
>>> To: Seger, Mark
>>> Cc: [email protected]
&
gt;From: Corey Minyard [mailto:[email protected]]
>Sent: Friday, March 26, 2010 8:43 AM
>To: Seger, Mark
>Cc: [email protected]
>Subject: Re: [Ipmitool-devel] performance questions
>
>Seger, Mark wrote:
>>> Has the OS version changed? Maybe a driver change caused
Seger, Mark wrote:
>> Has the OS version changed? Maybe a driver change caused it. Or if you
>> are running over the LAN, maybe networking changes?
>>
>
> Unfortunately I haven't a clue. This is standard RHEL5.3 so everything is
> off-the-shelf. As for the communications path, I'm only talk
>Has the OS version changed? Maybe a driver change caused it. Or if you
>are running over the LAN, maybe networking changes?
Unfortunately I haven't a clue. This is standard RHEL5.3 so everything is
off-the-shelf. As for the communications path, I'm only talking to the local
machine.
-mark
>
Has the OS version changed? Maybe a driver change caused it. Or if you
are running over the LAN, maybe networking changes?
-corey
Seger, Mark wrote:
>
> I’ve been using ipmitool inside my collectl monitoring tool for some
> time now and it’s been fairly efficient, thanks to some optimizations
I've been using ipmitool inside my collectl monitoring tool for some time now
and it's been fairly efficient, thanks to some optimizations from this mailing
list. However I've recently noticed it's gotten much slower and I don't know
if something has changed OR if it's the actual hardware archi
17 matches
Mail list logo
