The author of this draft's email address has changed. His new address is:
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
Bob
At 01:35 PM 6/22/2000 -0700, Bob Hinden wrote:
>I forgot to add that this document is now an IPng w.g. document. We
>inherited it when the ION w.g. concluded.
>
>Bob
>
>At 01:26 PM 6/22/2000 -
> On Sat, 17 Jun 2000 21:11:56 +0200,
> Francis Dupont <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> said:
> In your previous mail you wrote (after reformatting into text):
>3) When multicast addresses are stored in a sockaddr_in6, how is the
>scope id field Interpreted?
> => I believe it should be an i
I forgot to add that this document is now an IPng w.g. document. We
inherited it when the ION w.g. concluded.
Bob
At 01:26 PM 6/22/2000 -0700, Bob Hinden wrote:
>This is a IPng working group last call for comments on advancing the
>following document as a Proposed Standard:
>
> Title
This is a IPng working group last call for comments on advancing the
following document as a Proposed Standard:
Title : Extensions to IPv6 Neighbor Discovery for Inverse
Discovery Specification
Author(s) : A. Conta
Filename
Rich, Francis,
>
> To answer your question - yes, the bind() of a multicast address should
> automatically join the group. So this is another reason to make
> sin6_scope_id field be an interface id for multicast addresses of all
> scopes.
>
I disagree with both of these things and generally
>> Another point en passant, should in this case a bind()
> with a non-zero
>> scope_id do an automatical IPV6_JOIN_GROUP?
>
>I don't follow this - you can't bind() a multicast address.
>
> => I can
Winsock (or least, the MS implementation) doesn't allow this. I didn't know
t
On Thu, 22 Jun 2000 06:37:56 GMT,
"Yuval Shaul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote,
: Does anybody know of anything (RFC, implementation, idea etc)about
: converting IPv4 packets to IPv6 packets ?
There are two implemented IPv4 - IPv6 translator using Socks.
# It doesn't actually 'convert' packets, thoug
I just got a bounce message from the first time,
apologies if this is a duplicate.
-Original Message-
From: Dave Thaler
Sent: Wednesday, June 21, 2000 5:44 PM
To: Richard Draves; Francis Dupont
Cc: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: RE: rfc2553bis comments
> > Another point en passant, should
In your previous mail you wrote:
> I believe you can make your set of rules simpler if you introduce
> a new lifetime (or condition if one needs something smarter than
> a delay). I'll call it "regen lifetime" and when the regen lifetime
> of an anonymous address expires then a new
In your previous mail you wrote:
My assumption was that recvfrom() and accept() should return sin6_flowinfo
from the received packet, and connect() and sendto() should take
sin6_flowinfo and put it into sent packets.
For bind(), I'd say either error if sin6_flowinfo is non-zero,
In your previous mail you wrote:
>more questions (I could not find answer from my archive):
>(4) what happens if we connect(2) with sin6_flowinfo filled?
>my guess is that sin6_flowinfo sticks into pcb, and
>will be attached to every packet we will sen
On 22-Jun-00 Francis Dupont wrote:
> In your previous mail you wrote:
>
>> Another point en passant, should in this case a bind() with a non-zero
>> scope_id do an automatical IPV6_JOIN_GROUP?
>
>I don't follow this - you can't bind() a multicast address.
>
> => I can and in
In your previous mail you wrote:
> Another point en passant, should in this case a bind() with a non-zero
> scope_id do an automatical IPV6_JOIN_GROUP?
I don't follow this - you can't bind() a multicast address.
=> I can and in fact I can bind() many sockets to the same multicas
I think you should read RFC2765.
- Original Message -
From: "Yuval Shaul" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
To: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Sent: Thursday, June 22, 2000 3:37 PM
Subject: IPv4 - IPv6 translation
> Does anybody know of anything (RFC, implementation, idea etc)about
> converting IPv4 packets to
Yuval Shaul asks:
>
> Does anybody know of anything (RFC, implementation, idea etc)
> about converting IPv4 packets to IPv6 packets?
Erik Nordmark and George Tsirtsis have written a couple of handy RFCs on
this topic, see:
RFC 2565, "Stateless IP/ICMP Translation Algorithm"
RFC 2566, "Network Ad
15 matches
Mail list logo
