Re: another renumbering question

2001-02-10 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Thu, 08 Feb 2001 14:39:18 -0600 From:Brian E Carpenter <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> This whole discussion has veered somewhere so far off into left field that it has ceased to become relevant to anything. There's no way the IETF (or ipngwg

[Fwd: Re: IPv6 Prefix Deprecation Problem]

2001-02-10 Thread T.J. Kniveton
"Hesham Soliman (ERA)" wrote: > => I don't have a concrete proposal but basically the problem > here is manual configuration of the Home address / prefix. > If the MN can decouple its identity from the Home prefix > and use something more abstract (eg. NAI) then the

[Fwd: Re: IPv6 Prefix Deprecation Problem]

2001-02-10 Thread T.J. Kniveton
"Hesham Soliman (ERA)" wrote: > => I don't have a concrete proposal but basically the problem > here is manual configuration of the Home address / prefix. > If the MN can decouple its identity from the Home prefix > and use something more abstract (eg. NAI) then the

Re: The case against naive anti-poison (was A6 and DNAME)

2001-02-10 Thread D. J. Bernstein
Huitema's assignment of blame is completely incorrect. This is not a subtle issue; there is a fundamental difference between the server knowing addresses and the server not knowing addresses. Let's take his inria.fr example. A cache contacts ns-ext.vix.com, one of the .fr servers, and learns