Re: NGtrans - DNSext joint meeting, call for participation

2001-07-22 Thread Matt Crawford
> ``Administrators normally insist on being able to change their records > with at most a few days notice,'' my web page says, as a starting point > for analyzing the expiration-date security issues. Yes, it does indeed say that. It has to say it, because imposing that ad-hoc restriction is nece

Re: NGtrans - DNSext joint meeting, call for participation

2001-07-22 Thread Matt Crawford
> Matt Crawford writes: > > So if it's all right for your > > interface ID and/or subnet information to persist for a month, but > > you want to be able to change your global prefix(es) on a day's > > notice, you get a 30-to-1 work savings on almost all of your RRsets. > > No. Under your one-mont