A New Internet-Draft is available from the on-line Internet-Drafts directories.
This draft is a work item of the IPNG Working Group of the IETF.
Title : Default Address Selection for IPv6
Author(s) : R. Draves
Filename: draft-ietf-ipngwg-default-add
Bill,
Can you tell me what the intended relationship is between the IPv6 MIBs
in RFC2452, RFC2454, RFC2465, and RFC2466 and the new MIBs the IPv6 MIB
Design team is working on? Is it intended that the new MIBs will replace
the previous MIBs? Or does the team expect some platforms to implement
Kristine,
The new mibs are intended to replace the existing IPv6 mibs. I
am not aware of any platforms that have implemented the old mibs, but
I am sure someone will point some out.
Regards,
Brian
Kristine Adamson wrote:
>
> Bill,
>Can you tell me what the intended relationship is bet
The plan is to deprecate the existing objects in these RFCs
in favor of the protocol-independent ones. The exact plan is not
yet known (e.g. publish a new revision with all objects listed
as deprecated vs. reclassify the old RFCs as historic, etc.).
The intent is definitely not to suddenly cau
Hello All -
According to RFC 2461 section 7.2.5 - Receipt of
Neighbor Advertisements, a host is to set the isRouter flag in the Neighbor
Cache entry based on the Router flag in the received advertisement.
So, if the flag changes, should the host make the
necessary modifications to the Def
>Kristine,
> The new mibs are intended to replace the existing IPv6 mibs. I
>am not aware of any platforms that have implemented the old mibs, but
>I am sure someone will point some out.
free software:
ucd-snmp (now net-snmp?) implements most of the older RFCs.
vend
Date:Wed, 25 Jul 2001 06:28:32 -0700
From:"D. J. Bernstein" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
| Crawford wants your signatures today to last for a month.
I doubt that Matt cares how long anyone's, but his own, signatures last.
| What happens
[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
> there is no requirement to re-sign every record to achieve
> your 1 day expiry. Just change the zone key whenever you change
> zone data and have a 1 day expiry on the zone key's signature.
No. If you maintain the validity of signatures on old records, you're
allowing
Dan,
there is no requirement to re-sign every record to achieve
your 1 day expiry. Just change the zone key whenever you change
zone data and have a 1 day expiry on the zone key's signature.
So daily you re-sign two RRsets.
Mark
--
Mark An
