Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda

2001-08-02 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Wed, 01 Aug 2001 14:11:23 -0700 From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Andreas Gustafsson) Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | When resolving, BIND 8 and 9 do reject | all records that are not within the domain whose authoritative | qservers are being queried. That's broke

Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda

2001-08-02 Thread itojun
One last comment - you and I are not agreeing on the urgency of this. If we don't pick or A6 right now, we cannot deploy IPv6 NS records and/or IPv6 MX records, we cannot convince gTLDs/ccTLDs to accept IPv6 NS record registrations. The deadline for picking th

Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda

2001-08-02 Thread D. J. Bernstein
Robert Elz writes: > before it has even had a reasonable chance to be tested We're saying ``deployment will be a disaster, and here's why.'' You're saying ``let's deploy it and see what happens.'' That's unacceptable. A6 and DNAME need to be killed _before_ people start relying on them. ---Dan -

Re: Joint DNSEXT & NGTRANS agenda

2001-08-02 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Thu, 02 Aug 2001 15:55:29 +0900 From:[EMAIL PROTECTED] Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | Now I can respond to your comments, I'm very happy. First of all | I would like to thank for all the comments for all the paragraphs | (just for clarificat