Hi Hani,
> I noticed that robust header compression requirements are missing from the
> "IPv6 for cellular hosts" draft. Should a section be added highlighting its
> importance and recommending its support (as a should requirement maybe)?
The authors discussed this early on, and as there are n
Hi, Juha!!
Yes, this is one of the most important but difficult issues to solve. I
guess you agree that one or fewer mechanisms are better to achieve a real
autoconfiguration :-)
In my scenario for fixed access services like DSL or FTTH, I assume:
- PE(NAS) -> CPE(Customer's Router) : stateful
>The last call for this document will end on May 27, 2002.
>
>The Internet Area Directors requested shortening the working group last
>call to allow time for the IESG to discuss the document to meet a 3GPP
>deadline.
not objecting to this particular change, but is it usual thing to
I noticed that robust header compression requirements are missing from the
"IPv6 for cellular hosts" draft. Should a section be added highlighting its
importance and recommending its support (as a should requirement maybe)?
Thanks,
Hani
-Original Message-
From: Bob Hinden [mailto:[EMA
