Re: Question on DHCPV6 RFC draft-ietf-dhc-dhcpv6-26.txt

2002-07-21 Thread Robert Elz
Date:Thu, 18 Jul 2002 12:10:19 -0500 From:"Imran Hafeez" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> | In the DHCPV6 RFC the IAADDR option specifies an IPV6 address but without | any indication to where the prefix & interface id starts and ends. However

Re: draft-itojun-ipv6-nodeinfo-revlookup-00.txt

2002-07-21 Thread itojun
>> i may be asking a stupid question, but where do you get that private >> key from? for instance, if a node responds with "www.ietf.org", >> we could get a public key for www.ietf.org by KEY RR query, but >> not the private key (it's on ietf.org authoritative server, and >>

Re: [mobile-ip] Re: HAO and BE processing will be mandated

2002-07-21 Thread itojun
>> draft 08-16: type, length, an IPv6 address and suboptions, type # = 201 >> draft 17-18: type, length and an IPv6 address, type # = 201 >There is no difference. There were no valid suboptions defined for >earlier drafts, even though the field was shown as possibly there >for future suboptions.