Re: Flow label draft issues & new text

2002-08-02 Thread Brian E Carpenter
I think in the end this is an argument about nothing. > This implies that IPv6 nodes SHOULD NOT establish any > flow-specific state unless so instructed by a specific flow state establishment >method. > What Margaret and itojun refer to are flow state establishment methods that happen to co

RE: Flow label draft issues & new text

2002-08-02 Thread jarno . rajahalme
Margaret, The draft explicitly states that each transport connection SHOULD be labeled, and explicitly mentions labeling enabling load-balancing that you described. So I do not think there is any conflict with the intent of the authors (and the text) and the uses you describe. The intent of t

RE: Flow label draft issues & new text

2002-08-02 Thread jarno . rajahalme
Itojun, Let's agree first what the "SHOULD NOT" applies to, see my response to Margaret. Anyway, we have explicitly tried to encourage KAME-style flow labeling as the default by the IPv6 stacks. But obviously there still are some details to get cleared up to avoid ambiguous interpretation of t

Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-router-selection-02.txt

2002-08-02 Thread Thomas Narten
Robert Elz <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Date:Wed, 31 Jul 2002 15:12:18 -0400 > From:Thomas Narten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > | Section 4 has some "mays", some of which might better be > | should/SHOULDs. I.e., an admin SHOULD set a l

getaddrinfo

2002-08-02 Thread Chirag H. Shroff
The following is an example from R Stevens book "UNP". I am having difficulties with the code shown below. When I try to compile it using.. gcc tcp_connect.c -lsocket -lnsl -lresolv -lc I get the following error messages baja{shroff}% gcc tcp_connect.c -lsocke

Re: getaddrinfo

2002-08-02 Thread Chirag H. Shroff
Thanks for your reply. I included the defination when i added again i got the following message: baja{shroff}% gcc tcp_connect.c -lsocket -lnsl -lresolv -lc Undefined first referenced symbol in file getaddrinfo /var/tmp/

Re: AD comments on draft-ietf-ipv6-router-selection-02.txt

2002-08-02 Thread Bob Hinden
>we might have the following choices (I can't think of other combinations that >make sense to me): >1. all are optional >2. load sharing is mandatory; others are optional >3. load sharing and router preferences are mandatory; more specific is >optional >4. all are mandatory The current proposa

Re: getaddrinfo

2002-08-02 Thread itojun
>The following is an example from R Stevens book "UNP". I am having difficulties >with the code shown below. the book has more than a couple of errors in IPv6 section, so be warned... >When I try to compile it using.. > gcc tcp_connect.c -lsocket -lnsl -lresolv -lc >I