Referring to item 5.3, we think that the timestamp value need not be set to
"Reserved".
This is because we can just use the timestamp and the current time to
determine that the PMTU has expired. For example, before sending out a
packet, the timer-based procedure should check if the PMTU to be u
In your previous mail you wrote:
>> Another way is to deprecate RFC2553 section 3.7, however, due to the
>> wide deployment of applications that use IPv6 basic API, the option is
>> not feasible.
>=> I strongly object to this part of your proposal. IMHO IPv6 is NOT
>a new pr
In your previous mail you wrote:
> >I'm going to ingore RFC 2710 on this point. I do not send MLD for link
> >local multicast groups.
>
>then your device will have trouble operating on coming switches
>that support MLD snooping, and it will be very difficult to
>tr
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Pekka Savola wrote:
> Whether RFC3041 is too complex mechanism for some of the needs is a
> different thing though. I think "randomizing" your MAC address once and
> for all (or every time your computer restarts or whatever) should be
> enough for most.
this bootstap rando
On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Mauro Tortonesi wrote:
> On Fri, 30 Aug 2002, Pekka Savola wrote:
>
> > Whether RFC3041 is too complex mechanism for some of the needs is a
> > different thing though. I think "randomizing" your MAC address once and
> > for all (or every time your computer restarts or whateve
Referring to the RFC3041, and based on the comments given below i think in
order to protect a mobile network, we can use the these approaches ;
Prevention and Detection. The prevention approach consists in reducing the
risk of threats by insuring that users respect the rules of usage of the
netw
